2019
DOI: 10.1080/24694452.2019.1673144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Race and the Geographies of Education: Markets, White Tone, and Racial Neoliberalism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research attention on the geographies of education has expanded rapidly in quantity and scope (Waters, 2016). Part of this expansion includes generative synergies across multiple diverse areas of research, including: critical geographies of education, radical youth work and participatory research (Dickens, 2017); shifting infrastructures, financial capital and geographies of schooling (Cohen and Rosenman, 2020); cultural and affective geographies (Ang and Ho, 2019); critical race theory (Hunter, 2020); children’s and young people’s geographies (Baillie Smith et al, 2016); and educational landscapes, neoliberalism and the ‘social reproduction of enduring regimes of power’ (Holloway and Kirby, 2019: 164), often understanding ‘schools as key sites at which issues such as power, identity, citizenship and participation are illuminated’ (Pini et al, 2017: 14). Holloway et al, (2010) draw attention to the ways in which unruly neoliberal logics, government policy and market responses from individuals and companies might be productively explored through the geographies of education, offering an example of Thiem’s (2009) argument that education is not a ‘discrete topical speciality’ but instead is a resource for decentred and outward-looking research, ‘one in which education systems, institutions, and practices are positioned as useful sites for a variety of theory-building projects’ (p.154).…”
Section: Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research attention on the geographies of education has expanded rapidly in quantity and scope (Waters, 2016). Part of this expansion includes generative synergies across multiple diverse areas of research, including: critical geographies of education, radical youth work and participatory research (Dickens, 2017); shifting infrastructures, financial capital and geographies of schooling (Cohen and Rosenman, 2020); cultural and affective geographies (Ang and Ho, 2019); critical race theory (Hunter, 2020); children’s and young people’s geographies (Baillie Smith et al, 2016); and educational landscapes, neoliberalism and the ‘social reproduction of enduring regimes of power’ (Holloway and Kirby, 2019: 164), often understanding ‘schools as key sites at which issues such as power, identity, citizenship and participation are illuminated’ (Pini et al, 2017: 14). Holloway et al, (2010) draw attention to the ways in which unruly neoliberal logics, government policy and market responses from individuals and companies might be productively explored through the geographies of education, offering an example of Thiem’s (2009) argument that education is not a ‘discrete topical speciality’ but instead is a resource for decentred and outward-looking research, ‘one in which education systems, institutions, and practices are positioned as useful sites for a variety of theory-building projects’ (p.154).…”
Section: Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are some studies that suggest that in post-Apartheid South Africa segregation is increasingly occurring along class lines, instead of racial lines (Mabin, 2005;McKay, 2019). Notwithstanding, there is still a strong correspondence between social class and the historical social order based on racial Apartheid -with a particular significance in the schooling system (Hunter, 2020).…”
Section: Pretoria's School Landscapementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geographical research on education to date has been strongly influenced by locational, socio-cultural, feminist and children’s geographies, such that studies which dominate examine questions about spatial and social equity in access; the material design of learning environments; education-related mobilities; and the making of young people’s subjectivities within educational spaces ( Kraftl et al, 2021 , Kučerová et al, 2020 , Waters, 2017 ). Research about the political-economy of education is of increasing importance too, as researchers pay greater attention to the marketisation of early years, school and higher education in neoliberal regimes ( Cohen, 2020 , Gallagher, 2018 , Harrison et al, 2016 , Hunter, 2019 ). Nevertheless, economic questions about supplementary education are only now being put onto the geographical agenda ( Holloway & Pimlott-Wilson, 2021 ).…”
Section: Supplementary Education Economic Geographies and Covid-19mentioning
confidence: 99%