R&amp;D Spillovers with Endogenous Absorptive Capacity: Lessons for Developing Countries

Bae, Chankwon

doi:10.2139/ssrn.2804910

Cited by 3 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For the authors, innovation should be seen as a base to improve companies' competitiveness. Regarding the culture of innovation, it is important to show the role of R&D as a precedent element of the diffusion process of innovation, relating this investment with better performance (Bae, 2016;Barrichello et al, 2020;Bertrand & Mol, 2013;Spezamiglio et al, 2016).…”

Section: Relationship Between Innovation and Competitiveness Of Nationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Interdependence Between Ease of Doing Business, Innovation, and Competitiveness of Nations

Morano

Jacomossi

Barrichello

et al. 2023

BAR, Braz. Adm. Rev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BAR maintains the practice of submitting all documents received to the plagiarism check, using specific tools, e.g.: iThenticate.Peer review: is responsible for acknowledging an article's potential contribution to the frontiers of scholarly knowledge on business or public administration. The authors are the ultimate responsible for the consistency of the theoretical references, the accurate report of empirical data, the personal perspectives, and the use of copyrighted material. This content was evaluated using the double-blind peer review process. The disclosure of the reviewers' information on the first page is made only after concluding the evaluation process, and with the voluntary consent of the respective reviewers.

show abstract

Section: Relationship Between Innovation and Competitiveness Of Nationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Interdependence Between Ease of Doing Business, Innovation, and Competitiveness of Nations

Morano

Jacomossi

Barrichello

et al. 2023

BAR, Braz. Adm. Rev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Firms absorb and adapt knowledge in their processes, transforming their structure and generating innovative products (Armstrong & Lengnick-Hall, 2013;Brettel, Greve, & Flatten, 2011;Cohen & Levinthal, 1990;Najafi-Tavani, Sharifi, & Ismail, 2014;Ritala & Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, 2013;Zahra & George, 2002). In addition to the absorption of existing knowledge, firms' investment in R&D is an element of innovation diffusion, helping to improve performance (Bae, 2016;Bertrand & Mol, 2013;Ha, Lee, & Kim, 2016). Calmanovici (2011) points out that the adoption of long-term industrial policy in strategic areas of emerging economies is fundamental for their stage of development and efforts in innovation in basic science and technology should be prioritized.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Firms absorb and adapt knowledge in their processes, transforming their structure and generating innovative products (Armstrong & Lengnick‐Hall, 2013; Brettel, Greve, & Flatten, 2011; Cohen & Levinthal, 1990; Najafi-Tavani, Sharifi, & Ismail, 2014; Ritala & Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, 2013; Zahra & George, 2002). In addition to the absorption of existing knowledge, firms’ investment in R&D is an element of innovation diffusion, helping to improve performance (Bae, 2016; Bertrand & Mol, 2013; Ha, Lee, & Kim, 2016).…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Determinant and priority factors of innovation for the development of nations

Barrichello

Santos

Morano

2020

INMR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose This study aims to identify the countries’ innovation factors that are determinant for them to achieve higher levels of development. In addition, the research identified which of these factors should be prioritized so the countries can move up in the rank of the most competitive. Design/methodology/approach The study used the indicators of innovation and the stage of development of 137 countries proposed by the Global Competitiveness Report published by the World Economic Forum and techniques of multivariate data analysis. Findings The results indicated that all the factors tested are determinant to lead the countries throughout their stages of development. The research highlights that the factors “Quality of scientific research institutions” and “Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) patent applications” should be equally prioritized for the countries’ development. Practical implications The results suggested that the factors Capacity for Innovation, Quality of Scientific Research Institutions, Company Spending on Research and Development (R&D), University–Industry Collaboration in R&D, Government Procurement of Advanced Technology Products, Availability of Scientists and Engineers and PCT Patent Applications are decisive for positioning countries in terms of their stage of development and should be part of their public policy and enterprises’ strategic planning. Originality/value The findings show that countries should prioritize the factors Quality of Scientific Research Institutions and PCT Patent Applications, as these factors, when acting together, predict the evolution to higher stages of development.

show abstract

“…One of these, called absorptive capacity, concerns the way firms absorb outside knowledge and adopt it in their processes, transforming their structure, and thus gaining innovative products as inputs, with results that increase their global competitiveness (Armstrong & Lengnick-Hall, 2013;Brettel, Greve, & Flatten, 2011;Cohen & Levinthal, 1990;Najafi-Tavani, Sharifi, & S. Ismail, 2014;Ritala & Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, 2013;Zahra & George, 2002). Other studies relate the importance of the role of R&D investment to the diffusion of innovations (Bae, 2016;Bertrand & Mol, 2013;Kim, 2015), associating this with improved performance. A third group of studies (Blomstrom, 1986;Blomstrom & Kokko, 1998;Liu, 2008;Suyanto, Bloch, & Salim, 2012;Suyanto & Salim, 2013) relates the role of foreign multinationals and local subsidiaries in the generation of knowledge transfers to the country which receives these new technologies, which thus increases the country's productivity and provides it with greater competitiveness in relation to other nations.…”

Section: A) the Relationship Between Innovation In The Corporate Envi...mentioning

confidence: 99%

The relationship between Innovation and Global Competitiveness: The mediating role of Management Practices evaluated by Structural Equation Modeling

Feldmann¹,

Jacomossi²,

Barrichello³

et al. 2019

RBGN

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose -This study seeks to investigate whether a good management environment in companies determines results in terms of country competitiveness. Additionally, it aims to verify if innovation plays a role in contributing to this.Design/methodology/approach -The study used structural equation modeling and data on 138 countries contemplated in The Global Competitiveness Report 2016. A number of theories have been used to relate competitiveness to innovation and to management practices. This discussion was expanded, taking these variables into account in a more comprehensive framework.

show abstract

R&D Spillovers with Endogenous Absorptive Capacity: Lessons for Developing Countries

Cited by 3 publications

References 23 publications

The Interdependence Between Ease of Doing Business, Innovation, and Competitiveness of Nations

The Interdependence Between Ease of Doing Business, Innovation, and Competitiveness of Nations

Determinant and priority factors of innovation for the development of nations

The relationship between Innovation and Global Competitiveness: The mediating role of Management Practices evaluated by Structural Equation Modeling

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About