2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11244-020-01398-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quo Vadis Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems for the Study of Heterogeneous Catalysts Inside the Electron Microscope?

Abstract: During the last decade, modern micro-electro-mechanical systems (MEMS) technology has been used to create cells that can act as catalytic nanoreactors and fit into the sample holders of transmission electron microscopes. These nanoreactors can maintain atmospheric or higher pressures inside the cells as they seal gases or liquids from the vacuum of the TEM column and can reach temperatures exceeding 1000 °C. This has led to a paradigm shift in electron microscopy, which facilitates the local characterization o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 174 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Which processes lead to deactivation and how can they be avoided? Significant efforts have thus been devoted to study the catalytic properties of catalyst particles by various microscopic or locally-resolved spectroscopic/diffractive methods, for example, by electron microscopy, [50,91,271,272] nuclear magnetic resonance, [273] (nano-) infrared, [274] X-ray microscopy [85c] and tomography, [51,275,276] fluorescence, [277] and plasmonic nanospectroscopy. [278] Recently, photoemission electron microscopy (PEEM) directly revealed a long-ranging communication effect of the metal/oxide interface with the internal surface sites of metal particles, as discussed below for two oxidation reactions.…”
Section: Mesoscopic Pd and Rh Particles Supported By Zro 2 : Imaging Kinetic Transitions And Long-range Interface Effects On Individual Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Which processes lead to deactivation and how can they be avoided? Significant efforts have thus been devoted to study the catalytic properties of catalyst particles by various microscopic or locally-resolved spectroscopic/diffractive methods, for example, by electron microscopy, [50,91,271,272] nuclear magnetic resonance, [273] (nano-) infrared, [274] X-ray microscopy [85c] and tomography, [51,275,276] fluorescence, [277] and plasmonic nanospectroscopy. [278] Recently, photoemission electron microscopy (PEEM) directly revealed a long-ranging communication effect of the metal/oxide interface with the internal surface sites of metal particles, as discussed below for two oxidation reactions.…”
Section: Mesoscopic Pd and Rh Particles Supported By Zro 2 : Imaging Kinetic Transitions And Long-range Interface Effects On Individual Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[85c] Operando electron microscopy can be performed in scanning (ESEM) or transmission (OTEM), the latter utilizing dedicated microreactors with electron transparent windows, coupled to sensitive MS analysis. [91][92][93]271,272] NAP-PEEM is still a niché, but will find more applications for sure. [197,198] Altogether, the ongoing technological development of new and more sensitive operando methods, both in timeand spatially-resolved modes, will enable new insights on active centers in catalytic systems.…”
Section: Further Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…when the electron beam interacts with the gas phase. [43] This example shows that spatially resolved operando techniques alone may be of limited use and should be complemented by quasi in situ imaging approaches and theory. [44,45]…”
Section: Complexion Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the system studied, the pressure-dependent chemical potential of reactive species might thus be too low to trigger specific processes and reactions that are relevant for catalytic function at higher pressure. However, the development and commercial availability of microelectromechanical-based reactors for in situ electron microscopy has extended the accessible pressure range by roughly two orders of magnitude ( 11 , 40 , 41 ) and enabled partially bridging the so-called pressure gap ( 42 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%