QUIT EMR trial: a prospective, observational, multicentre study to evaluate quality and 24 hours post-transport morbidity of interhospital transportation of critically ill patients: study protocol

Abstract

IntroductionIt is widely accepted that transportation of critically ill patients is high risk. Unfortunately, however, there are currently no evidence-based criteria with which to determine the quality of various interhospital transport systems and their impact on the outcomes for patients. We aim to rectify this by assessing 2 scores which were developed in our hospital in a prospective, observational study. Primarily, we will be examining the Quality of interhospital critical care transportation in the Euregion Meuse-Rhine (QUIT EMR) score, which focuses on the quality of the transport system, and secondarily the SEMROS (Simplified EMR outcome score) which detects changes in the patient's clinical condition in the 24 hours following their transportation.Methods and analysisA web-based application will be used to document around 150 pretransport, intratransport and post-transport items of each patient case.To be included, patients must be at least 18-years of age and should have been supervised by a physician during an interhospital transport which was started in the study region.The quality of the QUIT EMR score will be assessed by comparing 3 predefined levels of transport facilities: the high, medium and low standards. Subsequently, SEMROS will be used to determine the effect of transport quality on the morbidity 24 hours after transportation.It is estimated that there will be roughly 3000 appropriate cases suitable for inclusion in this study per year. Cases shall be collected from 1 April 2015 until 31 December 2017.Ethics and disseminationThis trial was approved by the Ethics committees of the university hospitals of Maastricht (Netherlands) and Aachen (Germany). The study results will be published in a peer reviewed journal. Results of this study will determine if a prospective randomised trial involving patients of various categories being randomly assigned to different levels of transportation system shall be conducted.Trial registration numberNTR4937.

Safety Hazards During Intrahospital Transport: A Prospective Observational Study

“…This study provides the foundation to design future interventions, which then can be implemented and evaluated. To improve quality and safety during transportation of critically 12 (15) ill patients future studies needs to determinate various systems impact on patient outcomes (49). Careful consideration of the risks of IHTs needs to be compared to the potential benefits for the patient.…”

Differences and Similarities Among COVID-19 Patients Treated in Seven ICUs in Three Countries Within One Region: An Observational Cohort Study*

“…Extensive information regarding participating hospitals, inclusion criteria ( 27 ), patient admission and transfer (Fig. 2 A ) ( 28 ), collected variables, project aims ( 22 , 29 ), and data collection, sharing, and cleaning ( 30 ) are described in Supplementary Digital Content 2 ( http://links.lww.com/CCM/G800 ). Briefly, using a predefined study protocol, we collected demographic and clinical characteristics (i.e., comorbidities, hemodynamic and laboratory variables, and scores to assess disease severity), ventilation, circulatory and renal support, antimicrobial/inflammatory therapies, complications (i.e., thromboembolic events), and outcome variables (i.e., duration ICU stay, mortality).…”

Transport of Critically Ill Patients – A Review of Early Interventions, Protocols, and Recommendations

“…The transportation was carried out by a team dedicated to transport and local mobile intensive care unit [23] . In 2017, they also identified the lacking of evidence-based criteria to regulate transportation quality [53] .…”