Background During the pandemic, increased numbers of patients requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission required an increase in ICU capacity, including ICU staffing with competence to care for critically ill patients. Consequently, nurses from acute care areas were called in to staff the ICU along with experienced intensive care nurses. Aims and objectives To describe Swedish registered nurses' experiences of caring for patients with COVID‐19 in ICUs during the pandemic. Design Mixed method survey design. Methods An online questionnaire was distributed through social media to registered nurses who had been working in the ICU during the COVID‐19 outbreak. Data were collected for 1 week (May 2020) and analysed using content analysis and descriptive statistics. Results Of the 282 nurses who participated, the majority were ICU nurses (n = 151; 54%). Half of the nurses specialized in ICU reported that they were responsible for the ICU care of three or more patients during the pandemic (n = 75; 50%). Among non‐intensive care nurses, only 19% received introduction to the COVID‐19 ICU (n = 26). The analysis of data regarding nurses' experiences resulted in three categories: tumbling into chaos , diminished nursing care , and transition into pandemic ICU care . Participants described how patient safety and care quality were compromised, and that nursing care was severely deprioritized during the pandemic. The situation of not being able to provide nursing care resulted in ethical stress. Furthermore, an increased workload and worsened work environment affected nurses' health and well‐being. Conclusions The findings from the present study indicate that nurses perceived that patient safety and quality of care were compromised during the pandemic. This resulted in ethical stress among nurses, which may have affected their physical and psychosocial well‐being. Relevance to clinical practice The COVID‐19 pandemic had a severe impact on nurses' work environment, which could result in burnout and staff turnover.

Findings suggest that intrahospital transport is a hazardous process for critically ill patients. We have identified several factors that may contribute to transport-related adverse events, which will provide the opportunity for the redesign of systems to enhance patient safety.

Background Health inequities arise when the public cannot access and understand health information in an easy, accessible, and understandable way. Evidence supports that health literacy (HL) is a determinant for health outcomes, and when HL is limited this may have a major impact on morbidity as well as mortality. Migrants are known to have limited HL. Therefore, this study aimed to explore comprehensive health literacy (CHL) and electronic health literacy (eHL) among Arabic-speaking migrants in Sweden. Methods This was a cross-sectional observational study conducted in Sweden. A total of 703 persons were invited to participate between February and September 2019. Two questionnaires – the Health Literacy Survey European Questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q16) and the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS) – and questions about self-perceived health and Internet use were distributed in Swedish and Arabic. Various statistical analyses were performed to determine the associations for limited CHL and eHL. Results A total of 681 respondents were included in the analysis. Of these, 334 (49%) were native Arabic-speaking migrants and 347 (51%) were native Swedish-speaking residents. CHL and eHL differed between the groups. The Arabic speakers had significantly lower mean sum scores in eHL 28.1 (SD 6.1) vs 29.3 (6.2), p = 0.012 and lower proportion of sufficient CHL 125 (38.9%) vs 239 (71.3%), p < 0.001 compared to Swedish speakers. Multiple regression analysis showed on associations between limited CHL and eHL and being Arabic speaking, less Internet use, and not finding the Internet to be important or useful. Furthermore, longer time spent in Sweden was associated with higher levels of CHL among the Arabic speakers, (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.91–0.98, p < 0.01). Conclusions CHL and eHL differ between Arabic-speaking migrants and native Swedish speakers, but also between Arabic speakers who have lived different lengths of time in Sweden. Though it seems that the eHealth literacy is less affected by language spoken, the Internet is suggested to be an appropriate channel for disseminating health information to Arabic-speaking migrants.

Background: Intrahospital transport is a high-risk procedure for critically ill patients, yet there is little known about how the transport team manages critical incidents that occur. Objectives: The aim of this study was to explore critical care nurses' and physicians' experiences and practices associated with critical incidents during the transfer process in critically ill patients. Methods: As a part of an ethnographic study, semistructured interviews were performed using the critical incident technique. Data were collected in two intensive care units at one university hospital in a Swedish metropolitan city. Critical care nurses (n ¼ 15) and physicians (n ¼ 5) were interviewed, together describing a total of 46 critical incidents. Data were analysed using qualitative content and thematic analysis approaches. Results: Content analysis of nurses' and physicians' practices resulted in a description of requirements for safe transports, including organisational prerequisites, professional skills and attributes, as well as actions and behaviours of safely performing transfers. Exploring the experiences of nurses and physicians in transporting critically ill patients yielded three main themes. The first theme, a hazardous process, revealed how caring for critically ill patients during intrahospital transfers was perceived as an unsafe, demanding task that presents several threats to the patient's safety. However, despite worries and concerns, participants trusted their own abilities to handle unexpected events, resulting in the second theme, performing when it matters. The third theme, towards safe practice, captured suggestions for improvement and attitudes towards existing safety hazards. Conclusions: To prevent and manage critical incidents during intrahospital transport, findings of this study suggest that nontechnical skills such as situational awareness and teamwork are essential. In addition, the team must possess the requisite technical skills and knowledge to undertake transports. Finally, organisations are required to provide a supportive and sustainable transport environment that includes fewer transport-related hazards.

ObjectiveTo develop and evaluate the psychometric properties of a scale measuring patient safety during the intrahospital transport process for intensive care.DesignThe scale was developed based on a theoretical model of the work system and patient safety, and items generated from participant observations. A Delphi study with international experts was used to establish content validity. Next, a cross-sectional study was undertaken to inform item reduction and evaluate construct validity and internal consistency.SettingThe questionnaire was distributed to healthcare practitioners at 12 intensive care units in Sweden.ParticipantsA total of 315 questionnaires were completed. Eligible participants were healthcare practitioners in the included units that performed an intrahospital transport during the study period. Inclusion criteria were (1) transports of patients within the hospital to undergo an examination or intervention, and (2) transports performed by staff from the intensive care unit. We excluded transports to a step-down unit or hospital ward.Outcome measuresPsychometric evaluation, including item analysis, validity and reliability testing.ResultsItems were reduced from 55 to 24, informed by distributional statistics, initial reliabilities, factor loadings and communalities. The final factor model consisted of five factors, accounting for 59% of variance. All items loaded significantly on only one factor (>0.35). The original conceptual model of teamwork, transport-related tasks, tools and technologies, environment, and organisation was maintained with regrouping of items. Cronbach’s alpha ranged from 0.72 to 0.82 for each subscale (ie, factor).ConclusionsThe present study provides a self-report questionnaire to assess patient safety during intrahospital transport of patients in intensive care. The results indicate acceptable validity and reliability of the scale among a sample of Swedish healthcare practitioners. If further confirmatory testing supports the present results, this scale could be a useful tool to better understand safety prerequisites and improve clinical practice.