Quid pro quo in online medical consultation? Investigating the effects of small monetary gifts from patients

Abstract

Recent years have seen robust growth in online medical consultation platforms. These platforms allow patients to access various healthcare services provided by doctors (e.g., health assessment, diagnosis, consultation, and supervision). In China, many such platforms allow patients to give small monetary gifts to doctors as an expression of gratitude. The implicit assumption is that expensive gifts influence doctors' medical service and generate conflicts of interest but small gifts do not. However, there is little empirical evidence to support this assumption. In order to fill this gap in the literature, our study investigates whether small gifts from patients impact the quality of service provided to the gift-givers (i.e., direct effect) and the nongivers (i.e., spillover effect). We examine three aspects of online medical service quality: (i) patient wait time, (ii) the amount of information in doctors' responses, and (iii) the degree of emotional support in doctors' responses. We find that despite the gifts' negligible monetary value, doctors who receive gifts do reciprocate to the gift-givers by providing them with more timely responses and greater emotional support. Furthermore, after receiving the small gifts, doctors may be slower in responding to nongivers and offer them less emotional support. We also investigate whether these effects (both direct and spillover effects) vary with doctors' backgrounds, including their professional experience and geographic location. Our findings have both theoretical and practical implications for patients, online medical consultation platforms, and healthcare policy makers.

Impact of a physician's prosocial behavior on the patient's choice: an empirical investigation in online health community

“…Examining factors that can impact a patient's choice has drawn much attention in OHCrelated studies (e.g. Huang et al, 2021;Zhao et al, 2022). However, most studies ignored the role of physician's prosocial behavior, which is found to have a significant impact on a patient's choice in our study.…”

Managing contributor performance in knowledge‐sharing communities: A dynamic perspective

“…Second, there is a growing body of research on the operation of digital platforms in the OM literature. These studies focus mainly on the management of individuals’ performance, such as ideation performance (Chan et al., 2021) and contest performance (Chen et al., 2021) on crowdsourcing platforms, weight management performance in healthcare communities (Yan, 2020), doctor performance on online medical consultation platforms (Zhao et al., 2022), and contributor performance in content‐sharing platforms (Wang et al., 2019; Wei et al., 2021). Our study adds to this stream of literature by providing an analysis of the management of contributor performance on knowledge‐sharing platforms.…”

Lending ears to unheard voices: An empirical analysis of user‐generated content on social media

“…The existing healthcare supply chains lack the element of real‐time information sharing and monitoring of the pandemic to provide solutions in a quick and organized manner (Yassaee et al., 2019). Recently, researchers have started looking in the direction of social media as its importance and relevance have drastically increased in other disciplines (Kumar & Qiu, 2021; Zhao et al., 2022).…”