Impact of a physician's prosocial behavior on the patient's choice: an empirical investigation in online health community

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to explore the influence of a physician’s prosocial behavior on a patient's choices in the online health community (OHC) context. Moreover, the authors explore how such effects differ across different online word-of-mouth (WOM) and professional titles.Design/methodology/approachGuided by the motivation, opportunity and ability (MOA) framework, this paper develops hypotheses and an econometric model. Then this paper used spline regression to test hypotheses on 6,204 physicians at The Good Doctor (www.Haodf.com), which is one of the largest Chinese OHCs. The authors conducted the propensity score matching and difference-in-difference method (PSM-DID) to address the concern about the bias caused by possible endogeneity concerns.FindingsThe authors’ results show that a physician’s prosocial behavior improves a patient's choice only when the strength of a physician’s prosocial behavior is below the tipping point. In addition, the influence of a physician’s prosocial behavior is heterogeneous for physicians with different online WOM and professional titles. For physicians with higher online WOM, the effect of a physician's prosocial behaviors on a patient's choice is positive, while for physicians with lower online WOM, a physician’s prosocial behavior has no impact on a patient’s choice. For physicians with higher professional titles, the quantity of a physician’s prosocial behavior has a positive impact on a patient’s choice, while for physicians with lower professional titles the quality of a physician’s prosocial behavior has a positive impact on a patient’s choice.Originality/valueThis study contributes new knowledge and provides new perspectives to study a patient's choice by addressing the importance of physician's prosocial behavior. With the effort of explicitly explaining the complex mechanisms, this study encourages physicians' engagement in a physician’s prosocial behavior and gives some implications on how to perform the behaviors strategically.

Consulting doctors online after offline treatment: investigating the effects of online information on patients' effective use of online follow-up services

“…Given the importance of online healthcare services, previous research has extensively investigated online information factors influencing patients' use of doctors' online healthcare services. However, extant research has mainly centered on patients' use decisions regarding online consultation services (i.e., how patients select a doctor for online consultations) (13,37,38) and offline appointment services (i.e., how patients select a doctor for offline appointments) (39)(40)(41) and has not fully investigated patients' use of doctors' OFUS, especially their effective use behaviors in this context (10).…”

Setting goal difficulty in monetary incentives to physicians: evidence from an online health knowledge-sharing platform

“…However, spiritual and monetary incentives may affect physicians differently in relation to PHKS incentives. For instance, research has shown that monetary incentives significantly positively affect extrinsic knowledge-sharing motivation but reduce intrinsically motivated contributions by physicians (Ghose et al, 2022;Wang et al, 2022). Some researchers have explored the spillover effects of different monetary incentive levels on health experts' free knowledge contribution behavior (Qi et al, 2021).…”

“…For instance, research has shown that monetary incentives significantly positively affect extrinsic knowledge-sharing motivation but reduce intrinsically motivated contributions by physicians (Ghose et al. , 2022; Wang et al. , 2022).…”

How green social network affordances enhance pro‐environmental behaviour?

“…Indeed, a statistics report showing 4.76 billion social media users clearly depicts the mounting increase in social media usage (Chaffey, 2023). Particularly, netizens are shifting towards specific online communities 1 to engage in context‐specific activities (Chang et al, 2023; Fernandez et al, 2016; Han et al, 2018; Klassen et al, 2021; Wang, Liu, et al, 2023; Zhu et al, 2020). These specific online communities can be more effective than generic social media because they drive homophily and provide relevant and focused content, thereby ensuring utility (Andrews, 2002; Hajli, 2018; Wang et al, 2022).…”