This research examines asynchronous participatory examinations, a new technology-mediated assessment strategy especially suitable for online courses. The participatory exam innovation utilizes information technology to support engaging students in the entire examination lifecycle, including creating and solving problems, and grading solutions. These learning processes enable students to not only gain new knowledge but also to strengthen their assessment skills. A five-semester field study in the U.S., supplemented by a small scale replication in Austria, investigated how participatory exams can facilitate higher-order learning and what explains students' acceptance of the innovation. An extended version of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), adapted to the educational context, predicts acceptance based on three key constructs: -perceived enjoyment,‖ -perceived learning,‖ and -recommendation for use.‖ The study results support the premises that participants perceive learning from all stages of the cooperative exam process, and that the innovation acceptance is a function of both intrinsic motivations (e.g., enjoyment of the experience) and extrinsic motivations (e.g., perception that one has learned from the process).
452Volume 26 Article 21 Increasing the effectiveness of online learning is of special interest to information systems researchers. Learning together online in a -virtual classroom,‖ instead of in a physical classroom, has become one of the most prevalent applications of IT; by Fall 2007 over 3.9 million university students in the U.S. were taking an online course [Allen and Seaman, 2008]. In addition, -e-training‖ courses are increasingly prevalent in the corporate sector. A great deal of investment in organizations is allocated to IT end-user training to enhance business productivity and competitiveness [Compeau and Higgins, 1995]. However, little attention has been paid to the quality of corporate etraining procedures and the assessment of learning outcomes. Currently, e-training is the trend for corporate IT training because of low cost, time and location flexibility. Though our study did not take place in a corporate etraining environment, many of the students who participated were being sponsored by their organizations, and the Volume 26