2018
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)30559-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Questionable efficacy of the rVSV-ZEBOV Ebola vaccine – Authors' reply

Abstract: JLB and MRS contributed equally. We declare no competing interests.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only adults older than 18 could be vaccinated. In addition to showing high efficacy among the vaccinated, the study revealed that unvaccinated people were indirectly protected against the Ebola virus through the vaccination method indicated [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Measures To Takementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only adults older than 18 could be vaccinated. In addition to showing high efficacy among the vaccinated, the study revealed that unvaccinated people were indirectly protected against the Ebola virus through the vaccination method indicated [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Measures To Takementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the efficacy of vaccination was questioned by claiming of a bias of the medical study team not staying in the communities of the delayed vaccination group, which could be considered as important for disease transmission, even suggesting that EVD was averted due to behavioral changes and the effect of the vaccine was 0% [ 139 ]. In response, the team behind the study confirmed that both the immediate and the delayed vaccination communities had similar exposure to health workers during the period after detection and no bias existed [ 140 ]. Moreover, at 10 days or more after randomization, eight unvaccinated contacts developed confirmed symptoms of EVD.…”
Section: Clinical Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vaccine was approved for 'compassionate use' in outbreaks, meaning that it had been proven sufficiently safe and effective to be recommended, although it had not yet been formally approved by a full regulatory process. According to later correspondence in The Lancet, the efficacy estimate of the vaccine remained at 100% despite concerns about bias in the research design (Longini et al 2018;Metzger and Vivas-Martínez 2018). The vaccine eventually contributed to the suppression of the 2013-2016 Ebola virus disease epidemic (Geisbert 2017;Calain 2018).…”
Section: Adaptive Trials In Epidemicsmentioning
confidence: 99%