Question framework for architectural description quality evaluation

Hämäläinen, Niina; Markkula, Jouni

doi:10.1007/s11219-008-9068-1

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Therefore, evaluation methods should include a speciic step for a review of such documentation and determine whether it is good enough to be used during evaluation [24,95]. Some studies have addressed architectural documentation review [25,58,95], but none of them with a focus on SoS. In the same perspective, our SLR revealed no study conducted the documentation review before or during the architectural evaluation.…”

Section: Open Issues and Research Opportunitiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of Systems-of-Systems Software Architectures: State of the Art and Future Perspectives

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The quality of large and complex Systems-of-Systems (SoS) that have emerged in critical application domains depends on the quality of their architectures, which are inherently dynamic in terms of reorganization at runtime to comply with domain needs. However, the way to model and evaluate the quality of these architectures is not clear. This article presents the state of the art regarding how SoS architectures have been evaluated. For this, we systematically examined the literature and, as a result, we discovered and summarized relevant architectural evaluation methods and associated modeling techniques and quality attributes, the maturity of these methods, as well as the benefits and costs of adopting them. We also address open issues and research opportunities and recommend that the mindset for SoS architecture evaluation must be changed to ensure the quality of SoS in critical domains.

show abstract

Section: Open Issues and Research Opportunitiesmentioning

confidence: 99%