2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-05476-6_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Query Expansion Using Medical Subject Headings Terms in the Biomedical Documents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our best performance in the official challenge results is achieved using query expansion limited to five MeSH terms per query token with a relatively light weighting, and yields an overall improvement in infNDCG of 11% over the baseline system. This is approximately near the middle of the range of improvement seen in other studies using vocabulary-based query expansion techniques ( 16 , 18 , 24 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…Our best performance in the official challenge results is achieved using query expansion limited to five MeSH terms per query token with a relatively light weighting, and yields an overall improvement in infNDCG of 11% over the baseline system. This is approximately near the middle of the range of improvement seen in other studies using vocabulary-based query expansion techniques ( 16 , 18 , 24 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…Queries in the dataset are, on average, 14 terms long, which is much shorter than the queries considered in this article (80 terms). After its introduction, the OHSUMED collection has been extensively used to evaluate classification (e.g., Genkin, Lewis, & Madigan, ; Han & Karypis, ; Xu & Li, ), learning to rank (e.g., Cao et al, ; Duh & Kirchhoff, ; Liu, Xu, Qin, Xiong, & Li, ), and query reformulation (Abdou & Savoy, ; Dong, Srimani, & Wang, ; Haveliwala, ; Hersh, Price, & Donohoe, ; Jalali & Borujerdi, ; Liu & Chu, ; Srinivasan, ; Thesprasith & Jaruskulchai, ). Works in the latter group are the most similar to our systems; they can be further partitioned based on the approach used: ontology‐based reformulation, Pseudo Relevance Feedback (PRF), and a combination of the two.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At query time, terms in the query are mapped to UMLS concepts; highly ranked concepts related to query concepts are then used for query expansion. Finally, Thesprasith and Jaruskulchai () introduced RABAM‐PRF, a variant of PRF that ranks MeSH terms found in the top documents and uses them for query expansion.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several works explore the query expansion strategy in the medical domain to improve the precision and recall of queries. Zhu et al [20], and more recently Thesprasith and Jaruskulchai [21], first identify medical terms in the query using a basic lexical tool and match them to MeSH ontology concepts. Then, they expand the found concepts by adding UMLS co-concepts, i.e.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%