The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2017
DOI: 10.1002/asi.23924
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning to reformulate long queries for clinical decision support

Abstract: The large volume of biomedical literature poses a serious problem for medical professionals, who are often struggling to keep current with it. At the same time, many health providers consider knowledge of the latest literature in their field a key component for successful clinical practice. In this work, we introduce two systems designed to help retrieving medical literature. Both receive a long, discursive clinical note as input query, and return highly relevant literature that could be used in support of cli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(1) Local context: first, an initial retrieval run is performed to build a list of ranked documents in response to the user's query. Most of the proposed QE methods are based on traditional document ranking models such as the language model [38,115,153,181,198] and the probabilistic model [151,201]. Then, terms contained in the top-ranked documents are extracted using a blind or pseudo-relevance feedback approach.…”
Section: Query Expansionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) Local context: first, an initial retrieval run is performed to build a list of ranked documents in response to the user's query. Most of the proposed QE methods are based on traditional document ranking models such as the language model [38,115,153,181,198] and the probabilistic model [151,201]. Then, terms contained in the top-ranked documents are extracted using a blind or pseudo-relevance feedback approach.…”
Section: Query Expansionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ad-hoc document retrieval (of both scientific articles and general domain documents) has been long-studied (Lalmas and Tombros, 2007;Hersh and Voorhees, 2009;Lin, 2008;Medlar et al, 2016;Sorkhei et al, 2017;Huang et al, 2019;Hofstätter et al, 2020;Nogueira et al, 2020b). Most recent work for scientific literature retrieval has focused on tasks such as collaborative filtering (Chen and Lee, 2018), citation recommendation (Nogueira et al, 2020a), and clinical decision support (Soldaini et al, 2017).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ad-hoc document retrieval (of both scientific articles and general domain documents) has been long-studied (Lalmas and Tombros, 2007;Hersh and Voorhees, 2009;Lin, 2008;Medlar et al, 2016;Sorkhei et al, 2017;Huang et al, 2019;Hofstätter et al, 2020;Nogueira et al, 2020b). Most recent work for scientific literature retrieval has focused on tasks such as collaborative filtering (Chen and Lee, 2018), citation recommendation (Nogueira et al, 2020a), and clinical decision support (Soldaini et al, 2017).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%