1988
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2614(88)87068-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quenching of two-photon-excited H(3s, 3d) and O(3p 3P2,1,0) atoms by rare gases and small molecules

Abstract: Measurements of the quenchmg rate coefficients for hydrogen atoms in the 3s 'S and 3d *D states and of oxygen atoms in the 3p 'P state by rare gases and several combustion-relevant collision partners are presented. The excited atomic states are prepared by two-photon laser excitation. Quenching cross sections for most collision partners are found to be larger than classical collision cross sections; H atoms are mostly quenched faster than 0 atoms. For the quenching of H and 0 atoms by the rare gases, the rate … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

13
70
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(2 reference statements)
13
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The values in our experiment for oxygen are systematically higher by approximately 30% than those communicated in [9]. We find again good agreement for τ Xe , k Xe Xe , and k Xe Ar with values from [11]; the values for k Xe H e , and k Xe Kr are higher by a factor of ≈1.7, however.…”
Section: Natural Lifetimes and Quenching Coefficientssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The values in our experiment for oxygen are systematically higher by approximately 30% than those communicated in [9]. We find again good agreement for τ Xe , k Xe Xe , and k Xe Ar with values from [11]; the values for k Xe H e , and k Xe Kr are higher by a factor of ≈1.7, however.…”
Section: Natural Lifetimes and Quenching Coefficientssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…For the hydrogen state we find a satisfactory agreement with values from [9,10]. The values in our experiment for oxygen are systematically higher by approximately 30% than those communicated in [9].…”
Section: Natural Lifetimes and Quenching Coefficientssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Photochemical effects of the 205 nm light on the flame gases 31,35,37 and stimulated emission due to the population inversion in the nϭ1, 2, and 3 levels of atomic hydrogen 38,39 are avoided by decreasing the laser power den-sity. In low pressure environments the collisional quenching of the fluorescence signal can be determined 37,40 and the H LIF signal can be quantified by comparison to measurements in a calibration reactor where the H concentration is known. 29,31,32 At atmospheric pressure, however, quantification of the signal is hampered by collisional quenching of the fluorescence, which not only depends on temperature and pressure, but also on the nature of the collision partners.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most efficient quencher for N (4D°/2) is the water molecule. This was alos noted for quenching of two-photon-excited H (3s, 3d) and O (3p3p2,1,0) atoms [30] where HzO had the largest quenching coefficient of various combustion-relevant collision ~artners. Most quenching coefficients for N atoms, with the exception of the one for CO, are very similar in magnitude to the ones for O atoms, whereas H atoms are quenched about a factor 3-5 faster.…”
Section: Flow Reactor Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 63%