Handbook of Interview Research 2001
DOI: 10.4135/9781412973588.n16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Queering the Interview

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
48
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Kong et al (2002) advocate for a "queer methodology", going beyond traditional "homosexual research" where the subject is perceived as the "other," which reinforces its exclusion and subordination to a hetero-centered regime of power. For this research, we attempted to "queer the interview" in order to avoid the trope of a "coming-out" story as the focal point of research.…”
Section: Methods: Reaching Participant Subjectivitymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Kong et al (2002) advocate for a "queer methodology", going beyond traditional "homosexual research" where the subject is perceived as the "other," which reinforces its exclusion and subordination to a hetero-centered regime of power. For this research, we attempted to "queer the interview" in order to avoid the trope of a "coming-out" story as the focal point of research.…”
Section: Methods: Reaching Participant Subjectivitymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As mentioned above, with reference to Kong et al (2001), we recognise that interview data is co-constructed and situated. In other words, this study does not make any claim to uncover 'true' versions of participants' work realities.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Loosely structuring the interview exchange meant that the agency of the interviewee was given primacy. From a queer theory perspective, we recognise that while interview data is co-constructed and situated, it can also be marred by heteronormativity with the effect of silencing LGBT voices (Kong et al, 2001). To overcome this, the interviews were carried out by the second author, himself a gay man, and it was felt that a shared sexual identity helped to engender participation, encouraging many participants to talk openly about their experiences.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research project that I am currently involved in is about understanding the poor prognostic outcomes for prostate cancer in the African Caribbean and African community. In order to overcome problems of my outsider status with this 'hard to reach' population, I have followed guidelines for good practice (Kong et al, 2003;Wheeler, 2003), which include: familiarising myself with the issues around the marginalisation of the participants in this context; carefully outlining the motivations behind the study and stipulating how the findings will be used; including public participation in the grant application; and consultations about the design of the research with key black and ethnic minority community members such as doctors, and others leading the field at a grass roots level. It is hoped that conducting the research in this way will aid recruitment and result in meaningful outcomes for the members.…”
Section: Insider/outsider Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%