2014
DOI: 10.1177/1350508413519766
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gay men in the performing arts: Performing sexualities within ‘gay-friendly’ work contexts

Abstract: An open access repository of Middlesex University research http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk Rumens, Nick and Broomfield, John (2014) Gay men in the performing arts: performing sexualities within 'gay-friendly' work contexts. Organization, 21 (3). pp. 365-382. ISSN 1350-5084 Final accepted version (with author's formatting)This version is available at: http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/15539/ Copyright:Middlesex University Research Repository makes the University's research available electronically.Copyright and moral righ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(65 reference statements)
1
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, discourses shared in this paper perpetuate the binarisms (straight vs gay, heterosexual vs homosexual) by using categories created to qualify and disqualify homosexuality (see Foucault, [1976]). In line with some recent literature that problematize the new‐born ‘gay‐friendly’ organizations (Rumens and Broomfield, ; Williams et al ., ), our research reveals how coming out (one of the column/pillar of inclusive and tolerant organizations), can be a slippery and ambiguous road, that we could not unproblematically valorize and address. We have illustrated in this paper how coming out functions as a discourse which, together with contextualized heteronormativity, disciplines (sexual) identities by defining, for example, what is the normal (and vice versa what is the abnormal) expression of homosexuality: coming out is a tricky discursive construction.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Instead, discourses shared in this paper perpetuate the binarisms (straight vs gay, heterosexual vs homosexual) by using categories created to qualify and disqualify homosexuality (see Foucault, [1976]). In line with some recent literature that problematize the new‐born ‘gay‐friendly’ organizations (Rumens and Broomfield, ; Williams et al ., ), our research reveals how coming out (one of the column/pillar of inclusive and tolerant organizations), can be a slippery and ambiguous road, that we could not unproblematically valorize and address. We have illustrated in this paper how coming out functions as a discourse which, together with contextualized heteronormativity, disciplines (sexual) identities by defining, for example, what is the normal (and vice versa what is the abnormal) expression of homosexuality: coming out is a tricky discursive construction.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…It suggests concern amongst the respondents that they would be easily identified through the dissemination of the research and that the loss of anonymity would result in negative consequences for them as individuals. Research from other sectors suggests that LgB employees face difficulties in integrating within dominant (heterosexual) cultures (Rumens & Broomfield, 2014). Further work is needed to understand how LgBT academics experience the workplace and how this shapes their professional identity and decisions to 'come out' .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is important because it connects with nascent strands in management studies exploring the ontological roots of heteronormativity to help expose ‘sexuality as a cultural invention rather than an intrinsic property of an individual’ (Ozturk and Rumens, , p. 513). Such reflexive critiques about how sexuality is articulated (Rumens and Broomfield, ) are important for developing a more critically engaged understanding of gendered notions of entrepreneurship. It also chimes with calls for analyses of the scale and shape of gay and lesbian engagement with entrepreneurial activities (Galloway, ; Kidney and Cooney, ).…”
Section: Concluding Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%