2013
DOI: 10.1177/0957926513486069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Queer Linguistic approaches to discourse

Abstract: This introductory essay to the Discourse & Society special issue on Queer Linguistic Approaches to Discourse discusses the theoretical underpinnings of the connection between discourse studies and Queer Theory within Queer Linguistics -a strand of research that has recently gained great momentum. It outlines basic issues in Queer Theory and their repercussions in Queer Linguistic debates and research. The Queer Linguistic objective to provide critical heteronormativity research is then related to Queer Discour… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
7

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
25
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Por parte de la prensa conservadora, podríamos hablar de silenciamiento en línea con lo defendido por Carratalá (2010). Diferentes estudios dentro de la corriente de la lingüística queer (Motschenbacher y Stegu, 2013; Giffney y O'Rourke, 2017) inciden en que esta actitud de silenciamiento de las personas o eventos LGTBI+ es una de las principales estrategias discursivas de discriminación contra este colectivo.…”
Section: Análisis Comparativo Prensa Conservadora-progresistaunclassified
“…Por parte de la prensa conservadora, podríamos hablar de silenciamiento en línea con lo defendido por Carratalá (2010). Diferentes estudios dentro de la corriente de la lingüística queer (Motschenbacher y Stegu, 2013; Giffney y O'Rourke, 2017) inciden en que esta actitud de silenciamiento de las personas o eventos LGTBI+ es una de las principales estrategias discursivas de discriminación contra este colectivo.…”
Section: Análisis Comparativo Prensa Conservadora-progresistaunclassified
“…The consequence of homonormativity, it is argued, is that gay men and lesbians who engage in practices such as marriage and child‐rearing, and perform broadly gender normative identities, are rewarded for being good citizens; those who fail to meet the normative ideal and are perceived as being too ‘queer’, in contrast, continue to be marginalised. On the other hand, it may be argued that framing such practices as ‘assimilationist’ positions them as part of the heterosexual domain, reproducing sexual binaries (Hall ) and casting gay men and lesbians who engage in them as passive or ignorant (Manalansan ; Motschenbacher and Stegu ).…”
Section: Theorising Sexual Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The field of critical applied linguistics in conjunction with queer linguistics can be particularly useful for responding to this call. Motschenbacher and Stegu (: 520) importantly note that queer linguistics is not the same as gay and lesbian linguistics in which the object of study is “queer subjects.” As they explain:
Using a Queer perspective […] is not so much a matter of deciding what is Queer, but of choosing to view certain behaviours in a non‐heteronormative light or from the perspective of the sexually marginalised.
Motschenbacher () and Motschenbacher and Stegu () argue that queer linguistics lends itself well to an eclectic combination of linguistic analytical frameworks (or methodological pluralism) in order to provide mutually qualifying positions. Leap () has also referred to a “scavenger methodology” as being particularly appropriate for queer inquiry across a range of disciplines.…”
Section: Queer Linguisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%