2020
DOI: 10.23923/pap.psicol2020.2940
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

¿qué Nos Importa Skinner, Treinta Años Después?

Abstract: The thirtieth anniversary of Skinner's death is taken as an occasion to visualize his presence in psychology today and remember some of his greatest contributions. In general, it can be said that Skinner is conspicuous by his absence, as there are many Skinnerian themes that barely mention him, and yet his presence is missed as his contributions would solve a number of important problems of psychology as a science. Skinnerian themes with hardly anything about Skinner are addictions to games and machines, the n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…tions and the assumption of a controlling homunculus have sparked criticism [Bördlein, 2016;Baum, 2017;Reinecke et al, 2018;Perez Alvarez, 2021]. They prompt the desire to return to a behaviorally oriented conceptual framework that lends itself to the experimental analysis of dependent and independent variables.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…tions and the assumption of a controlling homunculus have sparked criticism [Bördlein, 2016;Baum, 2017;Reinecke et al, 2018;Perez Alvarez, 2021]. They prompt the desire to return to a behaviorally oriented conceptual framework that lends itself to the experimental analysis of dependent and independent variables.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%