¿Qué es la argumentación práctica?

Gómez, Júlder

doi:10.17230/co-herencia.14.27.9

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Focusing on practical argumentation, we can say it is used to solve practical problems; it is always social and leads to decision-making or collective action (Audi 2015;Walton and Krabbe 1995;Gómez 2017). As such, its conclusions should be practical and should modify the initial problem, resulting in an action or any intention to act in a specific manner (Gómez 2017;Tindale 2017).…”

Section: Conceptualizationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Theoretical Considerations for the Articulation of Emotion and Argumentation in the Arguer: A Proposal for Emotion Regulation in Deliberation

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The concern for the role of emotion in argumentative encounters has rested upon the concept of emotion as arguments, emotions to obtain the adherence of the audience and reflect the virtues of a good arguer. In this paper, we focus on understanding emotion and argumentation based on cognitive approaches that identify the relationship between the two elements, to propose the use of emotion regulation strategies in deliberative dialogue. Bearing in mind that the intensity of emotional responses may, in some cases, hamper one's capacity to solve problems during a practical argument, we suggest that the use of emotion regulation strategies may favor deliberative dialogue, leading to more adaptive emotional responses and, in turn, better argumentative encounters, rendering decision-making more efficient. This article conceptualizes argumentation, revealing the historical path of emotion in studies on argumentation. It presents the concepts of emotion and emotion regulation, followed by the function of emotion regulation in argumentative encounters, illustrating this in two different situations. We conclude with the contribution made by the use of strategies for emotion regulation during deliberative dialogue.

show abstract

Section: Conceptualizationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Theoretical Considerations for the Articulation of Emotion and Argumentation in the Arguer: A Proposal for Emotion Regulation in Deliberation

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Critérios de adequação didática emergentes na argumentação prática de futuros pedagogos

Sol,

Breda,

Richit

et al. 2024

Zetetike

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

O artigo tem como objetivo analisar quais são os critérios de adequação didática emergentes na argumentação prática de futuros pedagogos, participantes de um ciclo de Lesson Study, ao planejarem uma aula sobre geometria plana para alunos da Educação Infantil. As sessões do ciclo foram vídeo-gravadas e duas delas foram analisadas, primeiro, com os modelos da Pragma-dialética e de Toulmin e, segundo, com os critérios de adequação didática. Como resultado, observa-se que os argumentos práticos dos futuros pedagogos para a escolha do material manipulativo a ser utilizado apontam para o uso de blocos lógicos e que os critérios que o sustentam baseiam-se, em maior medida, no de meios, seguido do epistêmico. Também, observa-se que o consenso dos participantes sobre a dinâmica da aula é que ela deveria partir da exploração dos blocos lógicos, seguido da produção, registro e exposição de obras de arte e que os critérios que sustentam tal tomada de decisão relacionam-se, respectivamente, com os de interação, ecológico e afetivo. Conclui-se que este estudo fornece uma ferramenta que permite mostrar, com detalhe, a estrutura dos argumentos práticos e o importante papel dos critérios de adequação didática na tomada de decisões didáticas de um coletivo de futuros professores.

show abstract

¿Qué es la argumentación práctica?

Abstract: ResumenAbstract *

Cited by 2 publications

References 16 publications

Theoretical Considerations for the Articulation of Emotion and Argumentation in the Arguer: A Proposal for Emotion Regulation in Deliberation

Theoretical Considerations for the Articulation of Emotion and Argumentation in the Arguer: A Proposal for Emotion Regulation in Deliberation

Critérios de adequação didática emergentes na argumentação prática de futuros pedagogos

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About