2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2005.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quaternary tectonic faulting in the Eastern United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They do not suggest, however, tectonic influence for any braided-meandering shifts or changes in meander size. Wheeler (2006) asserts that no definite fault line has been identified, casting doubt on the fault-induced changes noted by Marple and Talwani (2000). Although different rates of uplift on parts of the Coastal Plain may cause variations in sinuosity and valley orientations, no clear indication of tectonic activity explains the pronounced changes from braided to meandering at 16-15 ka or the large meandering channels noted above in Sections 3.3 and 3.4.…”
Section: Forcing Mechanisms Of River Channel Changementioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They do not suggest, however, tectonic influence for any braided-meandering shifts or changes in meander size. Wheeler (2006) asserts that no definite fault line has been identified, casting doubt on the fault-induced changes noted by Marple and Talwani (2000). Although different rates of uplift on parts of the Coastal Plain may cause variations in sinuosity and valley orientations, no clear indication of tectonic activity explains the pronounced changes from braided to meandering at 16-15 ka or the large meandering channels noted above in Sections 3.3 and 3.4.…”
Section: Forcing Mechanisms Of River Channel Changementioning
confidence: 91%
“…These authors also suggested maximum rates of late Pleistocene and Holocene uplift along the east coast fault system of about 1.5 mm/yr. Despite several Holocene earthquakes near Charleston, however, no definite faults have been identified (Wheeler, 2006). The Cape Fear Arch is a prominent tectonic feature in central North Carolina that has been found to influence the position of the Cape Fear River (Soller, 1988) by pushing it to the west on the western flank of the Cape Fear Arch.…”
Section: Regional Settingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Along much of the U.S. Atlantic coast, the tectonic contribution to RSL change is assumed to be negligible over timescales of centuries to millennia (e.g., Rowley et al, 2013), but parts of the North Carolina coastal plain are underlain by the Cape Fear Arch (Sheridan, 1976) (Figure 1b). Geologic and geomorphic data suggest that uplift of the crest of the Cape Fear Arch began during the Pliocene (Wheeler, 2006) and is ongoing (Brown, 1978). Late Holocene rates of uplift (RSL fall) have been estimated at ∼0.2 ± 0.2 mm/yr (e.g., Marple and Talwani, 2004;van de Plassche et al, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, it is hard to assess the recurrence of large passive margin earthquakes. Except in the Charleston area [ Talwani and Schaeffer , 2001], little paleoseismic data exist [ Wheeler , 2006]. As a result, one can only use regional frequency‐magnitude data.…”
Section: Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%