2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.06.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quaternary Arctic Ocean sea ice variations and radiocarbon reservoir age corrections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
61
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
2
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, average sedimentation rates in the central Arctic Ocean over longer time periods must be compared with great caution since there are indications of large fluctuations over time. For example, Hanslik et al (2010) note that MIS 2 appears to be absent in the studied core from the Lomonosov Ridge, and this is also found in cores from the Amerasian Basin (Adler et al, 2009). This may be linked to the presence of extensive ice shelves Jakobsson et al, 2010) and overall cold oceanographic conditions during glacial periods preventing melt out and delivery of sediments.…”
Section: Arctic Ocean Sediment Stratigraphymentioning
confidence: 73%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, average sedimentation rates in the central Arctic Ocean over longer time periods must be compared with great caution since there are indications of large fluctuations over time. For example, Hanslik et al (2010) note that MIS 2 appears to be absent in the studied core from the Lomonosov Ridge, and this is also found in cores from the Amerasian Basin (Adler et al, 2009). This may be linked to the presence of extensive ice shelves Jakobsson et al, 2010) and overall cold oceanographic conditions during glacial periods preventing melt out and delivery of sediments.…”
Section: Arctic Ocean Sediment Stratigraphymentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The same abundance pattern is noted for both planktic and benthic foraminifera when comparing MIS 3 and 1. Hanslik et al (2010) suggest that this signal may reflect different circulation regimes in the central Arctic Ocean with more inflow of Atlantic water during the MIS 3 interstadials, as well as less dense sea ice cover compared to the present interglacial, although they do not rule out that different sedimentation rates during the two periods may skew the results. Reduced sea ice during MIS 3 does not agree with the ostracode results of Cronin et al (2010).…”
Section: Arctic Ocean Sea Icementioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…An age model based on eleven radiocarbon analyses on planktic foraminifer from TC-18, has been proposed by Hanslik et al 20 High-resolution 210 Pb data allowed us to carry over this age model to MC-18 as illustrated in Figure 2. The sedimentation rate is estimated to be 1.7 cm ka − 1 during the Holocene.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%