2019
DOI: 10.1088/1402-4896/ab10b6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quasi-biennial periodicities and heliospheric modulation of geomagnetic activity during solar cycles 22–24

Abstract: We have studied the monthly variations of geomagnetic activity (aa index) for the period 1986–2016. We have observed the heliospheric effect on geomagnetic activity, with zero time lag in the ascending and descending phases during the solar cycles 22 to 24. We have investigated midterm periodicity patterns of geomagnetic activity such as Rieger type (∼120–195d), quasi-annual period (∼378d), and quasi-biennial period (∼1.34–4.42y), using the fast Fourier transform technique and the Morlet wavelet transform for … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 38 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, future solar activity is also unknown at the current time, and so it can not be directly used to estimate future geomagnetic activity. There are many methods that can be used to predict the maximum amplitude of the sunspot cycle (R m ), such as (i) statistical methods, employing the relationship between the inter-cycle parameters (Thompson, 1988;Hathaway et al, 1994) or the early rising rate (Thompson, 1988;Cameron and Schüssler, 2008;Du and Wang, 2012b); (ii) functional methods, using mathematical functions of a few parameters (Hathaway et al, 1994;Du, 2011d) for extrapolating the following monthly values; (iii) geomagnetic precursor methods (Brown and Williams, 1969;Ohl and Ohl, 1979;Du et al, 2009), using the geomagnetic activity near the solar minimum; and (iv) solar precursor methods (Schatten et al, 1978;Pesnell and Schatten, 2018), using the previous cycle's polar field.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, future solar activity is also unknown at the current time, and so it can not be directly used to estimate future geomagnetic activity. There are many methods that can be used to predict the maximum amplitude of the sunspot cycle (R m ), such as (i) statistical methods, employing the relationship between the inter-cycle parameters (Thompson, 1988;Hathaway et al, 1994) or the early rising rate (Thompson, 1988;Cameron and Schüssler, 2008;Du and Wang, 2012b); (ii) functional methods, using mathematical functions of a few parameters (Hathaway et al, 1994;Du, 2011d) for extrapolating the following monthly values; (iii) geomagnetic precursor methods (Brown and Williams, 1969;Ohl and Ohl, 1979;Du et al, 2009), using the geomagnetic activity near the solar minimum; and (iv) solar precursor methods (Schatten et al, 1978;Pesnell and Schatten, 2018), using the previous cycle's polar field.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%