2017
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.118.020402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum Steering Inequality with Tolerance for Measurement-Setting Errors: Experimentally Feasible Signature of Unbounded Violation

Abstract: Quantum steering is a relatively simple test for quantumness of correlations, proving that the values of quantum-mechanical measurement outcomes come into being only in the act of measurement. By exploiting quantum correlations Alice can influence-steer-Bob's physical system in a way inaccessible in classical world, leading to violation of some inequalities. Demonstrating this and similar quantum effects for systems of increasing size, approaching even the classical limit, is a long-standing challenging proble… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(71 reference statements)
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors show that increasing the dimension of the quantum systems, the violation of certain steering inequalities can become arbitrarily large. Experimental demonstrations of this fact was proposed in [44,49]. Our work continues this line of investigation by making the connection to inclusions of free spectrahedra, in particular the matrix cube, which is a well studied object in convex optimization theory [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The authors show that increasing the dimension of the quantum systems, the violation of certain steering inequalities can become arbitrarily large. Experimental demonstrations of this fact was proposed in [44,49]. Our work continues this line of investigation by making the connection to inclusions of free spectrahedra, in particular the matrix cube, which is a well studied object in convex optimization theory [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Finally, it is pointed out that there exist possible ways to improve the performance of our DI steering protocol and avoid the potential loopholes. For example, the delicate methods proposed in [15,25,43] may help to tolerate more worse transmission loss and measurement eciency. Moreover, the resource ecient method used in [44] could improve the success probability of the partial BSM, and the self-testing could be more noise robust by adopting other techniques [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See Ref. [32] for detailed discussions about the issue of imprecise experimental verification and how to overcome the problem by including the tolerance for measurement-setting errors. It also can be analyzed in an manner similar to self-testing multipartite entangled states [33].…”
Section: Experimental Observationmentioning
confidence: 99%