2017
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.95.014425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum phase transitions in the HeisenbergJ1J2triangular antiferromagnet in a magnetic field

Abstract: We present the zero temperature phase diagram of a Heisenberg antiferromagnet on a frustrated triangular lattice with nearest neighbor (J 1 ) and next nearest neighbor (J 2 ) interactions, in a magnetic field. We show that the classical model has an accidental degeneracy for all J 2 /J 1 and all fields, but the degeneracy is lifted by quantum fluctuations. We show that at large S, for J 2 /J 1 < 1/8, quantum fluctuations select the same sequence of three sublattice co-planar states in a field as for J 2 = 0, a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In NaYbO 2 , external magnetic field triggers long-range order above 2 T with an up-up-down spin pattern [146] typical of the 1 3 -plateau phase of triangular antiferromagnets. In the fully isotropic (Heisenberg) case, this up-updown phase occurs only at J 2 /J 1 < 0.125 [150,151] suggesting that J 2 /J 1 should be lower than in YbMgGaO 4 , in agreement with the fact that the absolute value of J 1 increases.…”
Section: Other 4f Materialsmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In NaYbO 2 , external magnetic field triggers long-range order above 2 T with an up-up-down spin pattern [146] typical of the 1 3 -plateau phase of triangular antiferromagnets. In the fully isotropic (Heisenberg) case, this up-updown phase occurs only at J 2 /J 1 < 0.125 [150,151] suggesting that J 2 /J 1 should be lower than in YbMgGaO 4 , in agreement with the fact that the absolute value of J 1 increases.…”
Section: Other 4f Materialsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…First, with the exception of Ba 3 CoSb 2 O 9 field-induced behavior is largely unknown, and even theory studies of the anisotropic J 1 − J 2 Hamiltonians in the applied field remain scarce [150,151]. NaYbO 2 shows a quite unusual transition between the spin-liquid phase in zero field and the collinear up-up-down phase in the applied field [145,146] (a similar transformation was claimed in randomness-influenced YbMgGaO 4 too [166]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This plateau has been observed in Cs 2 CuBr 4 [13][14][15][16][17] and in Ba 3 CoSb 2 O 9 [18]. An UUD state survives in a finite range of perturbations, like the spatial anisotropy of the exchange interaction [10][11][12][19][20][21][22], multiple-spin ring exchange [23], and the next nearest neighbor exchange [24], as long as the perturbations are not strong enough to close the minimal excitation gap in the UUD state. What replaces the UUD state at larger perturbations has been the subject of intensive research over the last several years [10-12, 20-22, 25-28]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…6. Though different from the fully polarized state [6,24], the quadratic Hamiltonian of the UUUD state gets corrections from quantum fluctuations, the calculation can be self-consistently carried out in powers of 1/S. For our purpose, it is enough to calculate K up to order 1/S.…”
Section: Corrections From Quantum Fluctuationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of multiple phase transitions and magnetization plateaus in a moderate magnetic field [76] is expected in the case of a XXZ triangular-lattice antiferromagnet [77,78]. This may also help to constrain the possible values of J 2 [79] and anisotropic exchanges, although exchange disorder may be very efficient at suppressing these features [80]. Because of their nonspin-conserving nature, dominant pseudodipolar interactions should manifest as an asymptotic approach to saturated magnetization, as recently observed in the candidate Kitaev spin liquid α-RuCl 3 [81].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%