2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.02.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum Monte Carlo Calculations of Light Nuclei

Abstract: Summary. -During the last 15 years, there has been much progress in defining the nuclear Hamiltonian and applying quantum Monte Carlo methods to the calculation of light nuclei. I describe both aspects of this work and some recent results. -IntroductionThe goal of ab-initio light-nuclei calculations is to understand nuclei as collections of nucleons interacting with realistic (bare) potentials through reliable solutions of the many-nucleon Schrödinger equation. Such calculations can study binding energies, exc… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
226
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(230 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
4
226
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In that case the main numerical effort goes into calculating the matrix elements of the Hamiltonian. Examples are the exact Faddeev and Faddeev-Yakubovsky equations for the 3-and 4-body system [15], the hyperspherical harmonics basis [16], or the Green's Function Monte Carlo method (GFMC) [17,18,19,20,21]. The other possibility is to represent the eigenstates of the Hamiltonian with many-body basis states |Φ [ν] which are chosen such that the numerical effort for calculating the matrix elements…”
Section: Effective Potentialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that case the main numerical effort goes into calculating the matrix elements of the Hamiltonian. Examples are the exact Faddeev and Faddeev-Yakubovsky equations for the 3-and 4-body system [15], the hyperspherical harmonics basis [16], or the Green's Function Monte Carlo method (GFMC) [17,18,19,20,21]. The other possibility is to represent the eigenstates of the Hamiltonian with many-body basis states |Φ [ν] which are chosen such that the numerical effort for calculating the matrix elements…”
Section: Effective Potentialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, it is known that details of the NNN interaction are important for nuclear structure applications. For example, the Urbana IX [19] and the Tucson-Melbourne [20,21,22] NNN interactions perform differently in mid-p-shell nuclei [16,23,24] although their differences appear to be minor. In the Green's function Monte Carlo (GFMC) calculations with the AV18 NN potential [25], the best results for p-shell nuclei up to A = 10 are found using the Illinois NNN interaction that augments the Urbana IX by a two-pion term from the Tucson-Melbourne NNN interaction and by three-pion terms that in the χEFT appear beyond the N 3 LO [26,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In view of the overall good agreement between the χEFT NN+NNN and AV18+UIX calculations, the photo-absorption cross section at low energy appears to be more sensitive to change in the α-particle size, than to the details of the spin-orbit component of the NNN interaction. In this regard, a more substantial role of the NNN force can be expected in the photo-disintegration of p-shell nuclei, for which differences in the spin-orbit strength have crucial effects on the spectrum [41,10]. Finally, the rather contained width of the theoretical band embracing the χEFT NN+NNN, AV18+UIX and UCOM results within 15 MeV from threshold is remarkable compared to the large discrepancies still present among the different experimental data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%