2020
DOI: 10.1063/5.0002013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum dot arrays in silicon and germanium

Abstract: Electrons and holes confined in quantum dots define an excellent building block for quantum emergence, simulation, and computation. In order for quantum electronics to become practical, large numbers of quantum dots will be required, necessitating the fabrication of scaled structures such as linear and 2D arrays. Group IV semiconductors contain stable isotopes with zero nuclear spin and can thereby serve as excellent host for spins with long quantum coherence. Here we demonstrate group IV quantum dot arrays in… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
102
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
102
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these demonstrations were achieved in GaAs heterostructures where the hyperfine interaction limits the coherence time to a few tens of nanoseconds. To create functional quantum-dot arrays on a more-scalable platform, such as silicon quantum dots [15][16][17][18], the same level of control and addressability needs to be achieved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, these demonstrations were achieved in GaAs heterostructures where the hyperfine interaction limits the coherence time to a few tens of nanoseconds. To create functional quantum-dot arrays on a more-scalable platform, such as silicon quantum dots [15][16][17][18], the same level of control and addressability needs to be achieved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can envision using this SLQD as a readout site in quantum protocols using spin shuttling at one end of the array for qubit readout [20,21] or in three-dimensional structures [22,23]. The second method relies on a reconfigurable SET [17]. For this purpose, one can use any of the QDs of the upper or lower linear array.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that most of research on effects of noise on Landau-Zener problem was focused on transverse noise [41,42] having white [41] or Lorentzian spectrum [42], with longitudinal noise achieving much less attention [42], and the case of 1/f β spectrum (highly relevant for charge noise in nanostructures used in solid state quantum information processing [43,44]) even less. We focus our attention here mostly on silicon-based quantum dots (as coherence times in Si are longer than in GaAs, and silicon architectures have better prospects for scalability [45], once it becomes possible to create spin qubits with industrial Si technology), but the presented theory is applicable also to GaAs-based spin qubits. We stress that we focus on transfer errors induced by charge noise, with less attention devoted to other sources of transfer imperfection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…roup-IV semiconductor spin qubits 1 are promising candidates to form the main building block of a quantum computer owing to their high potential for scalability towards large 2D-arrays [2][3][4][5] and the abundance of net-zero nuclear spin isotopes for long quantum coherence 6,7 . Over the past decade, all prerequisites for quantum computation were demonstrated on electron spin qubits in silicon, such as singleshot readout of a single electron 8 , high-fidelity single-qubit gates 9,10 and the operation of a two-qubit gate [11][12][13][14] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%