Proceedings of the 16th ACM International Conference on Computing Frontiers 2019
DOI: 10.1145/3310273.3323053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum computing simulator on a heterogenous HPC system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table I shows the results of our evaluations. Here, the first two columns identify the benchmark circuit and the respective number of decisions (i.e., cross-block gates) 2 . Then, the runtime of the JKQ DDSIM Schrödinger-style simulator is listed, while the remaining four columns contain the runtime and the speedup for the general decision diagram-based hybrid Schrödinger-Feynman scheme (see Section IV-A) and the optimized scheme using arrays for the final additions (see Section IV-C), respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table I shows the results of our evaluations. Here, the first two columns identify the benchmark circuit and the respective number of decisions (i.e., cross-block gates) 2 . Then, the runtime of the JKQ DDSIM Schrödinger-style simulator is listed, while the remaining four columns contain the runtime and the speedup for the general decision diagram-based hybrid Schrödinger-Feynman scheme (see Section IV-A) and the optimized scheme using arrays for the final additions (see Section IV-C), respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13, we could simulate up to 35 qubits on a single node. The base implementation without the cache blocking technique is described in [11] and chunks are exchanged when the target qubits of the gates are larger or equals to chunk qubit. The base implementation was implemented as the set of a State and qubit register classes shown in Fig.…”
Section: A Computer Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Universal quantum computing simulations [4]- [6] are now available for developing quantum applications with smaller numbers of qubits (around 20 qubits) on classical computers, even on desktop or laptop personal computers. To simulate rather more qubits (around 50-qubits), parallel simulators [7]- [11] must store the quantum state in the huge distributed memory in parallel-processing computers. Parallel computing has the advantage of accelerating simulations that require a huge amount of computational power.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The simulation of circuit-based quantum processors is already implemented by several research collaborations and companies. Some notable examples of simulation software which are based on linear algebra approach are Cirq [19] and TensorFlow Quantum (TFQ) [20] from Google, Qiskit from IBM Q [21], PyQuil from Rigetti [22], Intel-QS (qHipster) from Intel [23] , QCGPU [24] and Qulacs [25], among others [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45]. While the simulation techniques and hardware-specific configurations are well defined for each simulation software, there are no simulation tools that can take full advantage of hardware acceleration in single and double precision computations, through a simple interface which allows the user to switch from multithreading CPU, single GPU, and distributed multi-GPU/CPU setups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%