eMagRes 2017
DOI: 10.1002/9780470034590.emrstm1505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum Chemistry and EPR Parameters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
53
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…DFT methods has proven useful and fairly accurate for calculations of EPR parameters of lighter radicals. 54 Timedomain DFT approaches have had acceptable agreement with absorption spectroscopy and assignments of isolated transitions. However, much work is needed for the computation of heavy main-group radical EPR parameters.…”
Section: Future Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…DFT methods has proven useful and fairly accurate for calculations of EPR parameters of lighter radicals. 54 Timedomain DFT approaches have had acceptable agreement with absorption spectroscopy and assignments of isolated transitions. However, much work is needed for the computation of heavy main-group radical EPR parameters.…”
Section: Future Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Larger disagreement between experiment and predicted hyperfine couplings are observed, including large a iso errors. 54 As the hyperfine coupling is an electronic core property, it is critical that allelectron basis sets are used and the recent development of relativistic contracted basis sets for the employment with relativistic approximation of heavier elements has shown potential to improve the accuracy of calculated EPR properties. 55 In the future, as more stable heavy main-group radicals are isolated, both EPR and its advanced techniques will continue to shed light on the electronic structure of the radical centre.…”
Section: Future Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, some authors have used DFT calculations to augment their interpretations of EPR data (Bissaro et al, 2018). While useful in a broad context, there are well-known problems in using DFT to give accurate representations of spin Hamiltonian parameters (Neese, 2009(Neese, , 2017. Indeed, these problems appear to be evident in DFT calculations performed on LPMOs.…”
Section: Simulation Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 26 Furthermore, a nonrigorous motivation for the validity of eq 14 for the full A and g tensors was given by Autschbach et al 43 The FC contribution to A vanishes in the long-distance limit, where there should be no spin density at the position of the nucleus. At the level of second-order degenerate perturbation theory (DPT2), the remaining contributions to g and A are 36 , 44 − 46 where the |Κ I SS ⟩ are the principal components ( M = S ) of the eigenstates of the nonrelativistic zeroth-order Hamiltonian H 0 nonrel = H 0 – H SOC with eigenvalues E I (0),nonrel . Equations 16 and 18 are the well-known orbital contributions to g and A , which make sizable contributions for transition metals, where SOC cannot be neglected.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%