Glycosyltransferases catalyze glycosidic bond formation using sugar donors containing a nucleoside phosphate or a lipid phosphate leaving group. Only two structural folds, GT-A and GT-B, have been identified for the nucleotide sugar-dependent enzymes, but other folds are now appearing for the soluble domains of lipid phosphosugar-dependent glycosyl transferases. Structural and kinetic studies have provided new insights. Inverting glycosyltransferases utilize a direct displacement S(N)2-like mechanism involving an enzymatic base catalyst. Leaving group departure in GT-A fold enzymes is typically facilitated via a coordinated divalent cation, whereas GT-B fold enzymes instead use positively charged side chains and/or hydroxyls and helix dipoles. The mechanism of retaining glycosyltransferases is less clear. The expected two-step double-displacement mechanism is rendered less likely by the lack of conserved architecture in the region where a catalytic nucleophile would be expected. A mechanism involving a short-lived oxocarbenium ion intermediate now seems the most likely, with the leaving phosphate serving as the base.

The enzymic degradation of insoluble polysaccharides is one of the most important reactions on earth. Despite this, glycoside hydrolases attack such polysaccharides relatively inefficiently as their target glycosidic bonds are often inaccessible to the active site of the appropriate enzymes. In order to overcome these problems, many of the glycoside hydrolases that utilize insoluble substrates are modular, comprising catalytic modules appended to one or more non-catalytic CBMs (carbohydrate-binding modules). CBMs promote the association of the enzyme with the substrate. In view of the central role that CBMs play in the enzymic hydrolysis of plant structural and storage polysaccharides, the ligand specificity displayed by these protein modules and the mechanism by which they recognize their target carbohydrates have received considerable attention since their discovery almost 20 years ago. In the last few years, CBM research has harnessed structural, functional and bioinformatic approaches to elucidate the molecular determinants that drive CBM-carbohydrate recognition. The present review summarizes the impact structural biology has had on our understanding of the mechanisms by which CBMs bind to their target ligands.

The wealth of information provided by the recent structure determinations of many different glycosyl hydrolases shows that the substrate specificity and the mode of action of these enzymes are governed by exquisite details of their three-dimensional structures rather than by their global fold.

The enzymatic degradation of recalcitrant plant biomass is one of the key industrial challenges of the 21st century. Accordingly, there is a continuing drive to discover new routes to promote polysaccharide degradation. Perhaps the most promising approach involves the application of "cellulase-enhancing factors," such as those from the glycoside hydrolase (CAZy) GH61 family. Here we show that GH61 enzymes are a unique family of copper-dependent oxidases. We demonstrate that copper is needed for GH61 maximal activity and that the formation of cellodextrin and oxidized cellodextrin products by GH61 is enhanced in the presence of small molecule redox-active cofactors such as ascorbate and gallate. By using electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy and single-crystal X-ray diffraction, the active site of GH61 is revealed to contain a type II copper and, uniquely, a methylated histidine in the copper's coordination sphere, thus providing an innovative paradigm in bioinorganic enzymatic catalysis.ellulose is Earth's most abundant biopolymer. Its exploitation as an energy source plays a critical role in the global ecology and carbon cycle. Industrial production of fuels and chemicals from this plentiful and renewable resource holds the potential to displace petroleum-based sources, thus reducing the associated economic and environmental costs of oil and gas production (1, 2) and promoting energy security as part of a balanced energy portfolio. However, despite the burgeoning potential of cellulose as a biofuel source, its remarkable recalcitrance to depolymerization has so far hindered the economical use of any form of lignocellulosic biomass as a feedstock for biofuel production (3, 4).In addressing the issue of cellulose recalcitrance, much effort has been directed toward harnessing the known cellulosedegrading enzymatic pathways found in fungi. The consensus model of enzymatic degradation involves the concerted action of a consortium of different endoglucanases and "exo"-acting cellobiohydrolases (collectively termed "cellulases"); both enzyme classes perform classical glycoside hydrolysis through attack of water at the anomeric center of oligo/polysaccharide substrates (5-9). Necessarily as part of the overall enzymatic degradation of cellulose, the initial enzymatic step must overcome cellulose's inertness by disrupting the cellulosic structure, thus allowing attack by traditional cellulases. Originally, Reese et al. (10) suggested that undefined enzymes could play a major role in this step. This notion remained a hypothesis until very recently when, in a key paper, Harris et al. (11) demonstrated that inclusion of a novel enzyme class, currently termed GH61 glycoside hydrolases in the CAZy database of carbohydrate-active enzymes (12), greatly increases the performance of Hypocrea jecorina (Trichoderma reesei) cellulases in lignocellulose hydrolysis. From this work, it was suggested that GH61s act directly on cellulose rendering it more accessible to traditional cellulase action (11). Moreover, recent genomi...

No abstract