2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-328x(00)00403-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum chemical study of parasitic reaction in III–V nitride semiconductor crystal growth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
93
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
7
93
1
Order By: Relevance
“…From the viewpoint of the substituent effect, the Mulliken charges of the alkyl groups R clearly show the well-known order of the ability for electron donation, -t-C 4 H 9 > -C 2 H 5 > -CH 3 . The ability for electron donation contributes to suppression of the intramolecular polarization that prevents the coordination interaction [9][10][11]. However, the M-N bond orders and the quantities of the Mulliken charge transfer from NH 3 to MR 3 inform us that 2 has the same degree of M-N coordination interaction as (C 2 H 5 ) 3 M⋅NH 3 for each M though it has a stronger one than (CH 3 ) 3 M⋅NH 3 , because three bulky t-butyl groups prevent the metal atom from configuring the distinct tetrahedral coordination observed in (CH 3 ) 3 M⋅NH 3 and (C 2 H 5 ) 3 M⋅NH 3 [9,10]: the tetrahedral coordination of M is quite easy to receive the lone pair of NH 3 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From the viewpoint of the substituent effect, the Mulliken charges of the alkyl groups R clearly show the well-known order of the ability for electron donation, -t-C 4 H 9 > -C 2 H 5 > -CH 3 . The ability for electron donation contributes to suppression of the intramolecular polarization that prevents the coordination interaction [9][10][11]. However, the M-N bond orders and the quantities of the Mulliken charge transfer from NH 3 to MR 3 inform us that 2 has the same degree of M-N coordination interaction as (C 2 H 5 ) 3 M⋅NH 3 for each M though it has a stronger one than (CH 3 ) 3 M⋅NH 3 , because three bulky t-butyl groups prevent the metal atom from configuring the distinct tetrahedral coordination observed in (CH 3 ) 3 M⋅NH 3 and (C 2 H 5 ) 3 M⋅NH 3 [9,10]: the tetrahedral coordination of M is quite easy to receive the lone pair of NH 3 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the growth of AlGaN layers at atmospheric-pressure MOVPE is inhibited by gas-phase reactions among precursors leading to adduct formation, called "parasitic reactions" [3 -5]. We have studied the mechanism of gas-phase reactions in MR 3 /H 2 /NH 3 (M = Al, Ga, In; R = CH 3 , C 2 H 5 ) systems by a quantum chemical approach [9 -17], and have clarified that the Al source gases and their deviates enhance reactivity to the parasitic reactions [9][10][11][12][13][14]. In order to suppress the parasitic reactions, we have to consider another Al source gas for the growth of AlGaN.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 No matter which one is dominant, the Lewis acid-base adducts (CH 3 ) 3 M:NH 3 are agreed to be the first product formed upon the precursor mixing at the entrance inlet. 29 When these adducts undergo irreversible decomposition into amide (CH 3 ) 2 MNH 2 or imide (CH 3 )MNH intermediates, further association (oligomerization) could bring them to initiate nanoparticle formations. Such a reaction channel is referred to as "adduct parasitic pathway".…”
Section: 27mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parasitic reaction is expected to be responsible for the phenomena. It has been reported that NH 3 can reduce the potential energy barrier of trimers and higher n-mers formation (Nakamura et al, 2000). Therefore, with the increase of the flux of NH 3 , the quantities of trimers and higher nmers which do not contribute to the growth will increase, and the growth rate of AlN will decrease.…”
Section: Parasitic Reaction Between Tmal and Nh 3 In Mocvdmentioning
confidence: 99%