2008
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.77.021106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum chaos, delocalization, and entanglement in disordered Heisenberg models

Abstract: We investigate disordered one-and two-dimensional Heisenberg spin lattices across a transition from integrability to quantum chaos from both a statistical many-body and a quantum-information perspective. Special emphasis is devoted to quantitatively exploring the interplay between eigenvector statistics, delocalization, and entanglement in the presence of nontrivial symmetries. The implications of basis dependence of state delocalization indicators (such as the number of principal components) is addressed, and… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
58
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
(173 reference statements)
1
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The entanglement measures, introduced in the context of Quantum Information Science, are used to characterize complexity in quantum many‐body systems. Entanglement and delocalization are found to be strongly correlated for disordered spin‐1/2 lattice systems .…”
Section: Thermodynamic Region: λT Markermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The entanglement measures, introduced in the context of Quantum Information Science, are used to characterize complexity in quantum many‐body systems. Entanglement and delocalization are found to be strongly correlated for disordered spin‐1/2 lattice systems .…”
Section: Thermodynamic Region: λT Markermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our analysis is thus restricted to a particular S z tot -sector. In order to deal with a reasonably large subspace, other symmetries [20] are avoided as follows. Open boundary conditions prevent momentum conservation; μ = 1 avoid conservation of total spin; and the subspace with L/3 up-spins guarantee that S z tot = 0.…”
Section: Models and Quenchesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…x σ (2) x , and σ (1) y σ (2) y . The trace and trace-norm of the projection of each operator into S 0 may be found using combinatorial arguments presented in [40], yielding: tr(Πσ (1) z Π) = tr(Πσ (2) z Π) = 0, tr((Πσ…”
Section: Average Generalized Entanglement Of Random Pure Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%