2017
DOI: 10.1002/andp.201600287
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Localization‐delocalization transitions in bosonic random matrix ensembles

Abstract: Localization to delocalization transitions in eigenfunctions are studied for finite interacting boson systems by employing one-plus two-body embedded Gaussian orthogonal ensemble of random matrices [EGOE(1+2)]. In the first analysis, considered are bosonic EGOE(1+2) for two-species boson systems with a fictitious (F ) spin degree of freedom [called BEGOE(1+2)-F ]. Numerical calculations are carried out as a function of the two-body interaction strength (λ). It is shown that, in the region (defined by λ > λ c )… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
(137 reference statements)
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They were introduced in [16] and extensively studied for fermions [17]. On the other hand the case of Bose particles has been less investigated and only few results are known and typically for the dense limit, N ≫ M [18,19].…”
Section: The Model and Basic Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They were introduced in [16] and extensively studied for fermions [17]. On the other hand the case of Bose particles has been less investigated and only few results are known and typically for the dense limit, N ≫ M [18,19].…”
Section: The Model and Basic Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is clearly seen from the results, as shown in Figure 2 , for the chaos measure number of principal components (NPC or ) and the information entropy ( ) both are defined in terms of , In the thermalization region, , and the spreading produced by and will be equal, generating maximum mixing with Gaussian strength functions and GOE fluctuations. These results have been well verified numerically (also the parametric forms of , and are well understood) using EGOE and BEGOE for spinless fermion and boson systems and also for fermion and boson systems with the spin, , degree of freedom (see [ 5 , 20 ] for details). Figure 2 shows some numerical results from EE, and it can be seen from these results that in isolated finite systems, interactions act as the heat bath [ 4 ], and there is the phenomena of localized thermal states.…”
Section: Delocalization Quench Dynamics and Thermalization In Eementioning
confidence: 53%
“… ( a ) Example of the number of principal components (NPC) vs. the normalized energy, , for a bosonic BEGOE - F ensemble with bosons in sp orbits, each doubly degenerate with a fictitious spin, . The numerical ensemble averaged results are represented by filled circles, while the continuous curve is from the formula for NPC (for further detail, see reference [ 20 ]). Note that the NPC value for GOE is 1 in the graph.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here with λ ∼ λ t , the spreading produced by h (1) and V(2) will be equal and thus generate maximum mixing with strength functions Gaussian and fluctuations GOE. These results are well verified numerically (also the parametric forms of λ c , λ F and λ t are well understood) using EGOE(1+2) and BEGOE(1+2) for spinless fermion and boson systems and also for fermion and boson systems with spin 1 2 degree of freedom [2,9,10,11,12]. There is good evidence that nuclear effective interactions are such that complex nuclei are in general in the region of thermalization [1,2,13,14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%