1999
DOI: 10.1007/s100520050438
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum and string shape fluctuations in the dual monopole Nambu–Jona–Lasinio model with dual Dirac strings

Abstract: The magnetic monopole condensate is calculated in the dual Monopole NambuJona-Lasinio model with dual Dirac strings suggested in Refs. [1,2] as a functional of the dual Dirac string shape. The calculation is carried out in the tree approximation in the scalar monopole-antimonopole collective excitation field. The integration over quantum fluctuations of the dual-vector monopole-antimonopole collective excitation field around the Abrikosov flux line and string shape fluctuations are performed explicitly. We cla… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1999
1999
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(12 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This corresponds to the London limit M σ = 2 M ≫ M C in the dual Higgs model with dual Dirac strings [5][6][7]. The inequality M σ ≫ M C means also that in the MNJL model we deal with Dual Superconductivity of type II [4]. In the tree σ-field approximation the r.h.s.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This corresponds to the London limit M σ = 2 M ≫ M C in the dual Higgs model with dual Dirac strings [5][6][7]. The inequality M σ ≫ M C means also that in the MNJL model we deal with Dual Superconductivity of type II [4]. In the tree σ-field approximation the r.h.s.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The dual Monopole Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model (MNJL) with dual Dirac strings as continuum space-time analogy of Compact Quantum Electrodynamics (CQED) [1] has been formulated in Ref. [2][3][4]. The MNJL-model is based on a Lagrangian, invariant under magnetic U(1) symmetry, with massless magnetic monopoles self-coupled through a local four-monopole interaction [2,3]:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations