2009
DOI: 10.1590/s0104-42302009000600022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quanto a escova deve ser introduzida no canal anal para avaliação citológica mais eficaz?

Abstract: In Group A, 39 patients had anal canal condylomas and the cytology was positive in 29 of them (74.3%). We also observed cytological alterations in 30 of 75 patients (40%) without clinical lesions in the anal canal. In Group B, there were 54 patients with condylomas and 13 of them (24.1%) were confirmed by cytology. In 40 patients with no clinical lesions, we observed that nine (22.5%) had cytological abnormalities Statistical analysis revealed that examination in Group A was more efficient. CONCLUSION. Specime… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Microarray analysis was carried out using the PAPILLOCHECK® (GREINER BIO‐ONE, Germany) kit. For the collection, an endocervical brush was introduced 4cm into the anal canal, rotated five times, removed, agitated in the transport solution (PapilloCheck® collection medium) provided by the manufacturer and then the brush tip left in the fluid . The resulting cell suspension was stored dry at 4–8°C.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microarray analysis was carried out using the PAPILLOCHECK® (GREINER BIO‐ONE, Germany) kit. For the collection, an endocervical brush was introduced 4cm into the anal canal, rotated five times, removed, agitated in the transport solution (PapilloCheck® collection medium) provided by the manufacturer and then the brush tip left in the fluid . The resulting cell suspension was stored dry at 4–8°C.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Endocervical brushes were used to collect anal samples. For the collection, the technique used was the introduction of the brush 4 cm into the anal canal and rotation three to four times . Brushes were then agitated in a transport solution provided by the manufacturer and the resulting cell suspension was stored dry at 4–8°C.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The technique used for collection consisted of introducing the brush 4 cm into the anal canal and rotating it. [8] The slides were fixed in alcohol and stained using the Papanicolaou method. Cytological abnormalities were classified according to the 2001 Bethesda criteria: Negative for malignancy; ASC-US; low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; ASC - cannot exclude a high-grade lesion; and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion and invasive carcinoma.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%