2013
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.88.124005
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantization of unstable linear scalar fields in static spacetimes

Abstract: We discuss the quantization of an unstable field through the construction of a "one-particle Hilbert space." The system considered here is a neutral scalar field evolving over a globally hyperbolic static spacetime and subject to a stationary external scalar potential. In order to prove our results we assume spacetimes without horizons and that the theory possess a "mass gap." Our strategy consists in building a complex structure, which arises from a suitable positive bilinear form defined over the space of cl… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(55 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, if we impose equal t canonical commutation relations, then [φ(0, 0), φ(t, x)] vanishes for x 2 > t 2 , meaning that the field is causal only if we interpret t as the 'chronological time', and becomes acausal if, instead, we treat T as time (see equation (30)). Vice versa, if we impose equal T canonical commutation relations, then [φ(0, 0), φ(X, T)] vanishes for X 2 > T 2 , and the field is causal if T is interpreted as the 'chronological time', and acausal if, instead, t is treated as time (see equation (35)).…”
Section: Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, if we impose equal t canonical commutation relations, then [φ(0, 0), φ(t, x)] vanishes for x 2 > t 2 , meaning that the field is causal only if we interpret t as the 'chronological time', and becomes acausal if, instead, we treat T as time (see equation (30)). Vice versa, if we impose equal T canonical commutation relations, then [φ(0, 0), φ(X, T)] vanishes for X 2 > T 2 , and the field is causal if T is interpreted as the 'chronological time', and acausal if, instead, t is treated as time (see equation (35)).…”
Section: Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The situation, here, is quite different from the previous case, because now the commutators are canonical in the coordinates {T, X}, in which the field is tachyonic. Of course, we may look for the 'tachyon analogue' of equations (37) and (38) (see [35] for a formal construction). However, it is easier to approach the problem by looking directly at the commutation relations.…”
Section: Canonical At T =mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantum fluctuations and, consequently, the expectation value of the stress-energy-momentum tensor, grow exponentially in time in the presence of these modes (see also Refs. [17,18] for further discussions on the quantization of unstable linear fields in static globally hyperbolic spacetimes). Now, we shall discuss in detail the radial part of modes v ∓ ωlµ and w ∓ Ωlµ , namely, ψ ∓ ωl (r)/r and ψ ∓ Ωl (r)/r, respectively.…”
Section: Quantizing the Field And Awaking The Vacuummentioning
confidence: 99%