2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.chieco.2011.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantity, quality, and regional price variation of cigarettes: Demand analysis based on a household survey in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
15
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
4
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies suggest that if we try to increase the total tax burden on cigarettes in China to meet with the World Bank yardstick of two thirds of the retail price level, the government should raise the specific excise tax to approximately 4 RMB per pack. However, a more feasible approach would be to raise the specific excise tax to 1 RMB per pack from the current level of less than 0.06 RMB per pack and then gradually increase it to 4 RMB per pack, in order to mitigate adverse effects on the cigarette industry (Sunley, ; Hu et al ., ; Chen and Xing, ). Therefore, in this subsection, we simulate a cigarette tax increase by 1, 2, 3, and 4 RMB per pack, respectively, and discuss their impacts, based on the assumption that the CNTC directly sets the retail prices of cigarettes at levels as directed by the government.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Studies suggest that if we try to increase the total tax burden on cigarettes in China to meet with the World Bank yardstick of two thirds of the retail price level, the government should raise the specific excise tax to approximately 4 RMB per pack. However, a more feasible approach would be to raise the specific excise tax to 1 RMB per pack from the current level of less than 0.06 RMB per pack and then gradually increase it to 4 RMB per pack, in order to mitigate adverse effects on the cigarette industry (Sunley, ; Hu et al ., ; Chen and Xing, ). Therefore, in this subsection, we simulate a cigarette tax increase by 1, 2, 3, and 4 RMB per pack, respectively, and discuss their impacts, based on the assumption that the CNTC directly sets the retail prices of cigarettes at levels as directed by the government.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In panel I of Table , we find an average own‐price elasticity at the brand level of –0.807, which measures the percentage change in demand for a particular cigarette brand if its price increases by 1% but prices of other brands remain unchanged. This is relatively high compared to previous estimates of price elasticities that assume cigarettes to be homogeneous (e.g., Hu and Mao, ; Lance et al ., ; Bishop et al ., ; Chen and Xing, ), due to consumers’ ability to substitute across brands.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As such, the total impact of cigarette price increases in China could be at least twice as large as what our estimates suggest. Additionally, several recent studies show that large cigarette price spreads across brands in China were associated with brand switching behaviour, and that increasing cigarette price may also lead to trading down among smokers for low quality and high-tar cigarettes 11 19–21. Our estimates did not take into account the impact of brand switching and trading down, absence of such behaviours, our estimates would become larger.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hasil yang serupa diperoleh Nguyen, Rosenqvist, & Pekurinen (2012) dengan elastisitas harga rokok di Eropa berkisar -0,30 hingga -0,40. Penelitian Chen & Xing (2011) dan Liu et al (2015 memperoleh angka elastisitas harga rokok tertinggi di China sebesar -0,81. Sementara itu, elastisitas harga jangka panjang permintaan rokok di Pakistan mencapai -1,17 (Mushtaq, Mushtaq, & Beebe, 2011).…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified