2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10334-016-0573-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative T1 and T2 MRI signal characteristics in the human brain: different patterns of MR contrasts in normal ageing

Abstract: ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to examine age-dependent changes in both T1-weighted and T2-weighted image contrasts and spin-echo T2 relaxation time in the human brain during healthy ageing.MethodsA total of 37 participants between the ages of 49 and 87 years old were scanned with a 3 Tesla system, using T1-weighted, T2 weighted and quantitative spin-echo T2 imaging. Contrast between image intensities and T2 values was calculated for various regions, including between individual hippocampal subfields… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, while AES is sensitive to an MR image property related to age, it seems to be distinct from fMRI-estimated head motion. A likely possibility is tht AES here is detecting age-related differences in gray/white matter contrast ratio (GWR), as have been previously observed (Knight et al, 2016; Magnaldi et al, 1993; Salat et al, 2009).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Thus, while AES is sensitive to an MR image property related to age, it seems to be distinct from fMRI-estimated head motion. A likely possibility is tht AES here is detecting age-related differences in gray/white matter contrast ratio (GWR), as have been previously observed (Knight et al, 2016; Magnaldi et al, 1993; Salat et al, 2009).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…1,2 The T 1 relaxation time, or spin-lattice relaxation time, is indeed tissue and field specific, and a growing amount of work supports the use of T 1 mapping as an in vivo marker of tissue microstructure in clinical and neuroscientific research, probing for instance disease-related tissue changes [3][4][5] or developmental plasticity and ageing. [6][7][8] Over the years, numerous MR techniques have been proposed and used to estimate T 1 values. 9 These include saturation-recovery 10 and inversion-recovery (IR) 11 -based measurements, Look-Locker 12 techniques and faster methods based on variable flip angles (VFAs), such as the VFA ultrashort echo time 13 and the driven-equilibrium single-pulse observation of T 1 (DESPOT1) method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the reliability tests and after establishing the most reliable method, analyses were performed by using estimates from the most reliable method to study the effect of age and imager heterogeneity. The effect of age on GM and WM tissue intensity contrast in structural MR images was previously demonstrated by several studies (18,19). To evaluate the effect of age on the reliability of thick-section brain volume estimates, the following experiment was performed: ICCs between thick-and thin-section volume estimates were iteratively calculated starting with the 10 youngest patients (age, 1-4 years) and then sequentially adding the next-older patient to the group.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there was a marginal decline of ICC for GMV and WMV, all ICC values remained excellent. The decline in GMV and WMV reliability can be attributed to decreasing GM and WM tissue intensity contrast with age (18,19).…”
Section: Technical Developments: Reliability Of Automated Methods Formentioning
confidence: 99%