Leveraging Clinical Imaging Archives for Radiomics: Reliability of Automated Methods for Brain Volume Measurement

Abstract

Purpose To validate the use of thick-section clinically acquired magnetic resonance (MR) imaging data for estimating total brain volume (TBV), gray matter (GM) volume (GMV), and white matter (WM) volume (WMV) by using three widely used automated toolboxes: SPM ( www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/ ), FreeSurfer ( surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu ), and FSL (FMRIB software library; Oxford Centre for Functional MR Imaging of the Brain, Oxford, England, https://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl ). Materials and Methods MR images from a clinical archive were used and data were deidentified. The three methods were applied to estimate brain volumes from thin-section research-quality brain MR images and routine thick-section clinical MR images acquired from the same 38 patients (age range, 1-71 years; mean age, 22 years; 11 women). By using these automated methods, TBV, GMV, and WMV were estimated. Thin- versus thick-section volume comparisons were made for each method by using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Results SPM exhibited excellent ICCs (0.97, 0.85, and 0.83 for TBV, GMV, and WMV, respectively). FSL exhibited ICCs of 0.69, 0.51, and 0.60 for TBV, GMV, and WMV, respectively, but they were lower than with SPM. FreeSurfer exhibited excellent ICC of 0.63 only for TBV. Application of SPM's voxel-based morphometry on the modulated images of thin-section images and interpolated thick-section images showed fair to excellent ICCs (0.37-0.98) for the majority of brain regions (88.47% [306924 of 346916 voxels] of WM and 80.35% [377 282 of 469 502 voxels] of GM). Conclusion Thick-section clinical-quality MR images can be reliably used for computing quantitative brain metrics such as TBV, GMV, and WMV by using SPM. RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Baseline structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging predicts early treatment response in schizophrenia with radiomics strategy

“…Radiomics (Kumar et al., 2012; Lambin et al., 2012), a central technique aiding decision‐making in clinical practice, is considered as “the bridge between medical imaging and personalised medicine” (Lambin et al., 2017). Generally speaking, radiomics features build upon the volume of interest and then they are linked to clinical data (Adduru et al., 2017; Aerts et al., 2014). Its increasing importance in medical imaging creates an ideal situation for application of radiomics in neuroradiology in which there is no “lesion” but there are “features” for mental disorders, that is, brain structure and connectome derived from MRI (Cui et al., 2019b; Jiang et al., 2018).…”

Changes of Brain Structure in Patients With Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer After Long-Term Target Therapy With EGFR-TKI

“…Compared to several other visual rating scales, including the Fazekas scale ( 41 ), Rotterdam Scan Study (RSS) scale ( 37 ), modified SVS ( 24 ), Koedam posterior atrophy (PA) scale ( 42 ), and Prins scale ( 25 ), which were developed specifically to rate the vulnerability of brain regions to atrophy in different types of dementias, the SVS has been recommended for observing longitudinal changes in WMLs for chronic diseases and their relationship to clinical variables ( 43 – 45 ). GMV changes have been evaluated using the VBM-toolbox on SPM8, and the reliability of extracting quantitative brain metrics, such as GMV, in clinical-quality MRIs has been justified ( 46 ). Uncorrected voxel-based statistics increase the sensitivity as FDR increases ( 28 ).…”

Postprandial Hyperglycemia Is Associated With White Matter Hyperintensity and Brain Atrophy in Older Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

“…Thus, it is necessary to separately measure gray and white matter volume to assess the burden of WMH in AD brain. Consequently, it may be more appropriate to estimate regional brain atrophy using voxel-based morphometry by statistical parametric mapping ( Adduru et al, 2017 ). Moreover, although we used a standard 1.5T scanner to examine WMH, high-field MR scanners have greater sensitivity for detecting small WMH ( Sicotte et al, 2003 ; Zwanenburg and van Osch, 2017 ).…”