2021
DOI: 10.1080/14697688.2021.1892171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative statistical robustness for tail-dependent law invariant risk measures

Abstract: When estimating the risk of a financial position with empirical data or Monte Carlo simulations via a tail-dependent law invariant risk measure such as the Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR), it is important to ensure the robustness of the plug-in estimator particularly when the data contain noise. Krätschmer et al. (2014) propose a new framework to examine the qualitative robustness of such estimators for the tail-dependent law invariant risk measures on Orlicz spaces, which is a step further from an earlier wo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proof. The result is established in [31,Lemma 4.1] which is an extension of [13, Lemma 1] (which is presented when p = 1). Here we include a proof for self-containedness.…”
Section: Consequently We Havementioning
confidence: 80%
“…Proof. The result is established in [31,Lemma 4.1] which is an extension of [13, Lemma 1] (which is presented when p = 1). Here we include a proof for self-containedness.…”
Section: Consequently We Havementioning
confidence: 80%
“…It follows by [48,Lemma 4.4] that (6.75) ≤ dl F M,p (P ⊗N , Q ⊗N ) ≤ Ldl F M,p (P, Q) (6.79) and hence inequality (6.74).…”
Section: 71)mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Let P ⊗N denote the probability measure on the measurable space (IR ⊗N , B(IR) ⊗N ) with marginal P on each (IR, B(IR)) and Q ⊗N with marginal Q. Now we can state the definition of statistical robustness of a statistic estimator, which is proposed in [18,48]. Definition 6.1 (Quantitative statistical robustness) Let M ⊂ P(IR) be a set of probability measures.…”
Section: 71)mentioning
confidence: 99%