1961
DOI: 10.1021/ja01481a027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Separation of Hyperconjugation Effects from Steric Substituent Constants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
62
0

Year Published

1964
1964
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 179 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
(1 reference statement)
2
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference between the sensitive and resistant strains was actually reflected in the difference in intercept and transport terms in Eqs. (3) and (4). The intercept in Eq.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference between the sensitive and resistant strains was actually reflected in the difference in intercept and transport terms in Eqs. (3) and (4). The intercept in Eq.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may also be the case for slight increases in potency induced by the introduction of bulky alkyl groups into the 4-position. The inhibitory activity (expressed as log [IP/ (100-IP)]) of 4-substituted BPs against HAChE is related to the Hancock steric parameter Ese 11,12) of the bridgehead substituent. The relationship is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values used for σ* and E s are obtained empirically, and represent the results from the investigations conducted by Taft [35] and Hancock et al [36]. The inspection of the figures reveals that the pK BH + values are uniquely influenced by neither Σσ* nor ΣE s .…”
Section: Hammett-taft Correlationsmentioning
confidence: 97%