2022
DOI: 10.36227/techrxiv.21172216
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Road Crack Evaluation by a U-Net Architecture using Smartphone Images and Lidar Data

Abstract: <p> Road cracks are an important concern of administrators. Visual inspection is labor-intensive and subjective, while previous algorithms detecting cracks from optical camera images were not accurate. Furthermore, the actual length and thicknesses of a crack cannot be estimated only from images. Light Detection and Ranging (Lidar) is a standard feature introduced on the latest smartphones. In this research, for completely automatic, accurate and quantitative road crack evaluation using smartphones, an u… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pei et al 17 used the Cascade R-CNN model and various data augmentation techniques, achieving an F1 score of 0.635 in global road damage detection. Yamaguchi T et al 18 developed a method for accurately assessing road cracks using U-Net through LiDAR data enhancement and morphological transformation. Arya et al 19 used the lightweight network MobileNet to detect road damage images from the RDD2020 datasets, achieving an F1 score of 0.52.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pei et al 17 used the Cascade R-CNN model and various data augmentation techniques, achieving an F1 score of 0.635 in global road damage detection. Yamaguchi T et al 18 developed a method for accurately assessing road cracks using U-Net through LiDAR data enhancement and morphological transformation. Arya et al 19 used the lightweight network MobileNet to detect road damage images from the RDD2020 datasets, achieving an F1 score of 0.52.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2019) pruned and utilized VGG16 to classify corrosion and crack defects in bridge structures, achieving accuracy rates of 93.6% and 98.5%, respectively. Novel networks like Faster Region‐CNN (Faster RCNN) and You Only Look Once (YOLO) series (Chun et al., 2023; Z. Zhou et al., 2022) have emerged for object detection, while Mask RCNN and U‐Net (Yamaguchi & Mizutani, 2023) are employed for segmentation. Recent researchers proposed EfficientNet and incorporated attention mechanisms (Chen & He, 2022; Y. Pan & Zhang, 2022; L. Zhang et al., 2023), separable convolution (Zhu et al., 2023; Zou et al., 2022), deformable convolution (Lei et al., 2023), atrous convolution (Siriborvornratanakul, 2023), and other strategies (Zheng et al., 2022) to further enhance model performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous crack detection algorithms are categorized into (1) image processing, (2) machine learning (ML), and (3) deep learning (DL)‐based algorithms (e.g., Shi et al., 2016; Yamaguchi & Mizutani, 2023; Yang et al., 2020). Considering target tasks, the algorithms can be also divided into (a) classification, (b) localization, and (c) segmentation‐type algorithms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%