2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41398-022-01834-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative multidimensional phenotypes improve genetic analysis of laterality traits

Abstract: Handedness is the most commonly investigated lateralised phenotype and is usually measured as a binary left/right category. Its links with psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders prompted studies aimed at understanding the underlying genetics, while other measures and side preferences have been less studied. We investigated the heritability of hand, as well as foot, and eye preference by assessing parental effects (n ≤ 5028 family trios) and SNP-based heritability (SNP-h2, n ≤ 5931 children) in the Avon L… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, this assessment appeared to provide useful information about handedness. For instance, Schmitz et al (2022) successfully identified a heritability estimate of handedness using the same 6-item questionnaire of ALSPAC, finding a similar heritability estimate to what was previously reported in twin studies (Medland et al, 2006(Medland et al, , 2009. Thus, we believe that the questionnaire has scientific validity and can inform the relationship between hand preference and fetal presentation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nonetheless, this assessment appeared to provide useful information about handedness. For instance, Schmitz et al (2022) successfully identified a heritability estimate of handedness using the same 6-item questionnaire of ALSPAC, finding a similar heritability estimate to what was previously reported in twin studies (Medland et al, 2006(Medland et al, , 2009. Thus, we believe that the questionnaire has scientific validity and can inform the relationship between hand preference and fetal presentation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Genetics are undoubtedly involved in handedness (Cuellar-Partida et al, 2021;McManus, 2021;Medland et al, 2006Medland et al, , 2009. Recently, using the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) cohort, Schmitz et al (2022) conducted a large study investigating the heritability of lateral preferences (i.e., handedness, footedness, eyedness). The authors found that individuals with parental left-sidedness are more likely to present the same trait.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the model is further extended to include cerebral polymorphisms that are based on a multitude of functional modules for different lateralized cognitive systems, such as language, praxis, and visuo-spatial functioning. This idea is in line with recent findings showing that multidimensional phenotypes improve the genetic analysis of laterality traits [23]. It is very encouraging to observe how a leading model in the field is adjusted to fit with recent empirical findings, even decades after it was first published.…”
Section: Theoretical Articlessupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Annett's Right-Shift theory also predicted a link between NRH and dyslexia determined by an "asymmetry gene" which would affect the typical left hemisphere lateralization for both language and handedness. This, and other single-gene theories (McManus, 1985) are not supported by recent genomic studies which show that in most cases, handedness is influenced by the combined effects of variants in a large number of genes (Armour et al, 2014;Cuellar-Partida et al, 2021;Schmitz et al, 2022). Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for handedness have identified some of these genes, some of which have also been implicated in neurodevelopmental conditions, including schizophrenia and dyslexia (Brandler et al, 2013;Brandler & Paracchini, 2014;Cuellar-Partida et al, 2021;Wiberg et al, 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%