2023
DOI: 10.1111/cdev.13914
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Language and reading impairments are associated with increased prevalence of non‐right‐handedness

Abstract: Handedness has been studied for association with language-related disorders because of its link with language hemispheric dominance. No clear pattern has emerged, possibly because of small samples, publication bias, and heterogeneous criteria across studies. Non-right-handedness (NRH) frequency was assessed in N = 2503 cases with reading and/or language impairment and N = 4316 sex-matched controls identified from 10 distinct cohorts (age range 6-19 years old; European ethnicity) using a priori set criteria. A … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 130 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding hemispheric specialization of language, our sample was overwhelmingly right‐handed. While we did not formally evaluate language dominance with functional MRI or an invasive Wada procedure, 95% of right‐handed individuals display left hemisphere language dominance, whereas 70% of left‐handed individuals display left hemisphere dominance, as well 56 . One possibility is that patients with variable degrees of right hemisphere language dominance might be adversely affected by right STN DBS, but inclusion of the small number of left‐handed and ambidextrous participants in our sample did not impact our group‐level findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding hemispheric specialization of language, our sample was overwhelmingly right‐handed. While we did not formally evaluate language dominance with functional MRI or an invasive Wada procedure, 95% of right‐handed individuals display left hemisphere language dominance, whereas 70% of left‐handed individuals display left hemisphere dominance, as well 56 . One possibility is that patients with variable degrees of right hemisphere language dominance might be adversely affected by right STN DBS, but inclusion of the small number of left‐handed and ambidextrous participants in our sample did not impact our group‐level findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%