2003
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4757-4246-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Models for Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
57
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 266 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
57
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This model -and its many variants and extensions -has found thousands of applications in the scientific literature over the past decades. We refer here to various overview publications, such as Charnes et al (1994), Zhu (2003), Färe et al (1998), Ray (2004), Cooper et al (2006), Zhu, Cook (2007), Suzuki, Nijkamp (2016a,b), Susuki, Nijkamp (2017), and Suzuki et al (2010Suzuki et al ( , 2015.…”
Section: Data Envelopment Analysis (Dea)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model -and its many variants and extensions -has found thousands of applications in the scientific literature over the past decades. We refer here to various overview publications, such as Charnes et al (1994), Zhu (2003), Färe et al (1998), Ray (2004), Cooper et al (2006), Zhu, Cook (2007), Suzuki, Nijkamp (2016a,b), Susuki, Nijkamp (2017), and Suzuki et al (2010Suzuki et al ( , 2015.…”
Section: Data Envelopment Analysis (Dea)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variables used to identify the frontiers of non-bankrupt and bankrupt groups need to be the same, that is, one variable used as output for non-bankruptcy will be applied as input for the bankrupt group and vice versa. The major reason is that DUMs identified as the benchmarks of each group, will be used as variablebenchmarks [16] to evaluate all companies, including non-bankruptcy (notated as G 1 ) and bankruptcy (notated as G 2 ) to classify their membership based on the same measurements. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To establish a general discriminant rule that a company can be classified to a des- ignated group if it is dominated only by a correspondent frontier, the stratification model [16] is further applied to deal with the overlap problem.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, DEA permits us to evaluate, appraise and rank CTAs in a risk-return framework without using traditional indices. Among the first studies in DEA to propose the evaluation of CTA classifications followed by the development of the benchmark models were Wilkens and Zhu (2001) and Zhu (2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Benchmarking models (Zhu, 2003) permits us to establish the relative standings of CTAs under investigations by ranking them in terms of efficiency. In other words, DEA can be seen as a benchmarking instrument because the "best practices" frontier is used as the "gold standard" of efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%