2005
DOI: 10.2493/jspe.71.1026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Measuring Method of Thermal Contact Resistance Considered Real Contact Area

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, sincc the rca] contact area Ar is in proportien to the force F, -'e have a]so revealcd that 6=6+fi =-1skxtin(F"iLl)'fiY (1) where 5' and 6, are approaching distance at the ]oad ofF' and F, respectively. The contact stiMiess ofthejoint k is identi fied 1'rom this equation (1) and the experimenta] data.…”
Section: Principleofidentificationofjointcontactstiffnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, sincc the rca] contact area Ar is in proportien to the force F, -'e have a]so revealcd that 6=6+fi =-1skxtin(F"iLl)'fiY (1) where 5' and 6, are approaching distance at the ]oad ofF' and F, respectively. The contact stiMiess ofthejoint k is identi fied 1'rom this equation (1) and the experimenta] data.…”
Section: Principleofidentificationofjointcontactstiffnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those researches arc carried out based on the neminal contact area without eonsidering real contact area. However, it has been revealed that the real contact area is far smaller than the nominal contact area, since thejoints have not always ideal fiatness [1].Then,wehaveproposedthequantitativemeasurement method ofcontact stiffiiess ofthejoint with same material combination eonsidering the real contact area [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These researches are carried out based on the nominal contact area. However, it has revealed that the real contact area is far smaller than the nominal contact area (7) ,since the joint surfaces have not always ideal flatness. Then, we (8) have proposed the quantitative measurement method of the contact stiffness of the joint with same material combination considering the real contact area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%