1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0191-8141(99)00077-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative kinematic flow analysis from the Main Central Thrust Zone (NW-Himalaya, India): implications for a decelerating strain path and the extrusion of orogenic wedges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
117
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 211 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
6
117
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both of these thrust faults are orogen-scale shear zones with penetrative deformation on the MT accommodating shortening at the foreland edge of the Caledonian orogeny (e.g., Peach et al, 1907;Elliot and Johnson, 1980;Law et al, 1986Law and Johnson, 2010;Dewey et al, 2015) and penetrative shear strains on the MCT accommodating southward-directed Oligocene-Miocene extrusion/exhumation of the overlying Greater Himalayan slab (e.g., Grujic et al, 1996;Grasemann et al, 1999;Godin et al, 2006;Law et al, 2013). Mylonitic grain shape foliations are well developed in rocks of both fault zones and mineral stretching lineations are parallel to the fault transport directions.…”
Section: Selected Quartz Mylonitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both of these thrust faults are orogen-scale shear zones with penetrative deformation on the MT accommodating shortening at the foreland edge of the Caledonian orogeny (e.g., Peach et al, 1907;Elliot and Johnson, 1980;Law et al, 1986Law and Johnson, 2010;Dewey et al, 2015) and penetrative shear strains on the MCT accommodating southward-directed Oligocene-Miocene extrusion/exhumation of the overlying Greater Himalayan slab (e.g., Grujic et al, 1996;Grasemann et al, 1999;Godin et al, 2006;Law et al, 2013). Mylonitic grain shape foliations are well developed in rocks of both fault zones and mineral stretching lineations are parallel to the fault transport directions.…”
Section: Selected Quartz Mylonitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quartz-rich Greater Himalayan Series orthogneisses and paragneisses in the hanging wall to the MCT exposed in NW and Eastern Sutlej transects, respectively, include quartz mylonites, quartz-mica schists, and quartz-garnet schists ( Vannay and Grasemann, 1998;Grasemann et al, 1999;Law et al, 2013). Quartz grain shapes are not as highly elongate as observed in the MT mylonites, owing to their extensive recrystallization, with mean grain sizes on the NW transect that vary with structural level from 200 to 250 µm (grain boundary migration microstructures) at ∼ 1000 m above the MCT to 75-95 µm at 200-750 m above the thrust, and 35-60 µm (dominantly subgrain rotation microstructures) at ∼ 75 m above the thrust surface (Law et al, 2013).…”
Section: Selected Quartz Mylonitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bounding shear zones may have opposite shear sense; the sole shear zone is always a thrust, while the roof shear zone may display normal or thrust sense, depending on the relative velocity 2004), 7, schematic velocity profile during return channel flow; 8, 750 ~ C isotherm structurally below which partial melt starts; 9, theological tip of the channel: at lower temperatures (for a given channel width and pressure gradient) Couette flow will dominate and all the material will be underthrust; 10, extruding crustal block (palaeo-channel): if the theological tip is at steady state, material points may move through this tip and pass from the weak crustal channel into the extruding block; 11, lower shear zone of the extruding crustal block (dominantly thrust-sense kinematics); 12, upper shear zone of the extruding crustal block (dominantly normal-sense kinematics); 13, focused surface denudation (controlled by surface slope and, as in the Himalaya, by orographic precipitation at the topographic front). (B)-(D) Possible strain distribution in an extruding crustal block; possible end-members (inspired by Grujic et al 1996;Grasemann et al 1999). (B) Rigid block with high concentration of strain along the boundaries .…”
Section: E X T R U S I O Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(C) Ductile block deforming by pervasive simple shear. (D) Ductile block deforming by general shear with a pure shear component increasing towards the bottom of the wedge, as well as with time following a 'decelerating strain path' (Grasemann et al 1999;Vannay & Grasemann 2001).…”
Section: E X T R U S I O Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation