An inverted metamorphic field gradient associated with a crustal-scale south-vergent thrust fault, the Main Central Thrust, has been recognized along the Himalaya for over 100 years. A major problem in Himalayan structural geology is that recent workers have mapped the Main Central Thrust within the Greater Himalayan Sequence high-grade metamorphic sequence along several different structural levels. Some workers map the Main Central Thrust as coinciding with a lithological contact, others as coincident with the kyanite isograd, up to 1-3 km structurally up-section into the Tertiary metamorphic sequence, without supporting structural data. Some workers recognize a Main Central Thrust zone of high ductile strain up to 2-3 km thick, bounded by an upper thrust, MCT-2 (¼ Vaikrita thrust), and a lower thrust, MCT-1 (¼ Munsiari thrust). Some workers define an 'upper Lesser Himalaya' thrust sheet that shows similar P-T conditions to the Greater Himalayan Sequence. Others define the Main Central Thrust either on isotopic (Nd, Sr) differences, differences in detrital zircon ages, or as being coincident with a zone of young (,5 Ma) Th-Pb monazite ages. Very few papers incorporate any structural data in justifying the position of the Main Central Thrust. These studies, combined with recent quantitative strain analyses from the Everest and Annapurna Greater Himalayan Sequence, show that a wide region of high strain characterizes most of the Greater Himalayan Sequence with a concentration along the bounding margins of the South Tibetan Detachment along the top, and the Main Central Thrust along the base. We suggest that the Main Central Thrust has to be defined and mapped on strain criteria, not on stratigraphic, lithological, isotopic or geochronological criteria. The most logical place to map the Main Central Thrust is along the high-strain zone that commonly occurs along the base of the ductile shear zone and inverted metamorphic sequence. Above that horizon, all rocks show some degree of Tertiary Himalayan metamorphism, and most of the Greater Himalayan Sequence metamorphic or migmatitic rocks show some degree of pure shear and simple shear ductile strain that occurs throughout the mid-crustal Greater Himalayan Sequence channel. The Main Central Thrust evolved both in time (earlymiddle Miocene) and space from a deep-level ductile shear zone to a shallow brittle thrust fault.

[1] The Ama Drime Massif (ADM) is an elongate north-south trending antiformal feature that extends $70 km north across the crest of the South Tibetan Himalaya and offsets the position of the South Tibetan Detachment system. A detailed U(-Th)-Pb geochronologic study of granulitized mafic eclogites and associated rocks from the footwall of the ADM yields important insights into the middle to late Miocene tectonic evolution of the Himalayan orogen. The mafic igneous precursor to the granulitized eclogites is 986.6 ± 1.8 Ma and was intruded into the paleoproterozoic (1799 ± 9 Ma) Ama Drime orthogneiss, the latter being similar in age to rocks previously assigned to the Lesser Himalayan Series in the Himalayan foreland. The original eclogite-facies mineral assemblage in the mafic rocks has been strongly overprinted by granulite facies metamorphism at 750°C and 0.7-0.8 GPa. In the host Ama Drime orthogneiss, the granulite event is correlated with synkinematic sillimanite-grade metamorphism and muscovite dehydration melting. Monazite and xenotime ages indicate that the granulite metamorphism and associated anatexis occurred at <13.2 ± 1.4 Ma. High-grade metamorphism was followed by postkinematic leucogranite dyke emplacement at 11.6 ± 0.4 Ma. This integrated data set indicates that high-temperature metamorphism, decompression, and exhumation of the ADM postdates mid-Miocene south directed midcrustal extrusion and is kinematically linked to orogen-parallel extension. Citation: Cottle,

Recent suggestions that the Greater Himalayan Sequence (GHS) represents a mid-crustal channel of low viscosity, partially molten Indian plate crust extruding southward between two major ductile shear zones, the Main Central thrust (MCT) below, and the South Tibetan detachment (STD) normal fault above, are examined, with particular reference to the Everest transect across Nepal-south Tibet. The catalyst for the early kyanite _ sillimanite metamorphism (650-680~ 7-8 kbar, 32-30 Ma) was crustal thickening and regional Barrovian metamorphism. Later sillimanite + cordierite metamorphism (600-680~ 4-5 kbar, 23-17 Ma) is attributed to increased heat input and partial melting of the crust. Crustal melting occurred at relatively shallow depths (15-19 km, 4-5 kbar) in the crust. The presence of highly radiogenic Proterozoic black shales (Haimanta-Cheka Groups) at this unique stratigraphic horizon promoted melting due to the high concentration of heat-producing elements, particularly U-bearing minerals. It is suggested that crustal melting triggered channel flow and ductile extrusion of the GHS, and that when the leucogranites cooled rapidly at 17-16 Ma the flow ended, as deformation propagated southward into the Lesser Himalaya. Kinematic indicators record a dominant southvergent simple shear component across the Greater Himalaya. An important component of pure shear is also recorded in flattening and boudinage fabrics within the STD zone, and compressed metamorphic isograds along both the STD and MCT shear zones. These kinematic factors suggest that the ductile GHS channel was subjected to subvertical thinning during southward extrusion. However, dating of the shear zones along the top and base of the channel shows that the deformation propagated outward with time over the period 20-16 Ma, expanding the extruding channel. The last brittle faulting episode occurred along the southern (structurally lower) limits of the MCT shear zone and the northem (structurally higher) limits of the STD normal fault zone. Late-stage breakback thrusting occurred along the MCT and at the back of the orogenic wedge in the Tethyan zone. Our model shows that the Himalayan-south Tibetan crust is rheologically layered, and has several major low-angle detachments that separate layers of crust and upper mantle, each deforming in different ways, at different times.The Tibetan plateau (Fig. 1), covering an area of >5 • 106 km, is an arid plateau with low relief and low erosion rates, and forms the largest area of high elevation (average elevation of 5023 m) and thick crust (65-80 km) on the planet (Fielding

No abstract