1988
DOI: 10.1016/0032-0633(88)90068-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative forecasting of the 27-day recurrent magnetic activity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…HAFv.2 was calibrated with the same MHD models used to develop ISPM and STOA [ Sun et al , 1985; Akasofu et al , 1988]. We would expect HAFv.2 to perform better at predicting SAT than those two models, because it accounts for the inhomogeneous interplanetary medium through which the shocks propagate and interact.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HAFv.2 was calibrated with the same MHD models used to develop ISPM and STOA [ Sun et al , 1985; Akasofu et al , 1988]. We would expect HAFv.2 to perform better at predicting SAT than those two models, because it accounts for the inhomogeneous interplanetary medium through which the shocks propagate and interact.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2] A quasi-27-day periodicity in various atmospheric, ionospheric, and magnetospheric parameters has previously been reported in numerous studies, some dating to before the space age [e.g., Bartels, 1950;Langehesse, 1953;Chkhetiya, 1975;Akasofu et al, 1988;Hapgood, 1993;Pancheva et al, 1991;Bowman, 1996;Rich et al, 2003;Apostolov et al, 2004;Hocke, 2008, and references therein]. The $27-day solar rotation period is clearly connected with recurrent periodicity in ionospheric disturbances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…If the computed velocity gradients are steep enough., t_he algoritbans allow forward and reverse shocks to be established. We have previously used a 1-D and a 2-D MHD model [Sun et al, 1985;Akasofu et al, 1988] and solar wind data [Olrnsted and to calibrate the earlier version of HAF (version 1) to determine the best set of proxy driver inputs and HAF model internal parameters.…”
Section: Model Improvementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparable performance of HAF, STOA, and ISPM is encouraging. HAF (version 1) was calibrated with the same • models used to develop ISPM and STOA [Sun et al, 1985;Akasofu et al, 1988]. Therefore we should not expect HAF (version 1) to perform better than those two models.…”
Section: /05 4/osmentioning
confidence: 99%