2016
DOI: 10.3390/jmse4020037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Estimates of Bio-Remodeling on Coastal Rock Surfaces

Abstract: Abstract:Remodeling of rocky coasts and erosion rates have been widely studied in past years, but not all the involved processes acting over rocks surface have been quantitatively evaluated yet. The first goal of this paper is to revise the different methodologies employed in the quantification of the effect of biotic agents on rocks exposed to coastal morphologic agents, comparing their efficiency. Secondly, we focus on geological methods to assess and quantify bio-remodeling, presenting some case studies in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, our results could be explained by the capacity of EMPB to move and shelter within microscopic spaces following an increase in light intensity and/or desiccation stress from the morning until the early afternoon. Although the vertical migration range in rock substrata is apparently limited, rock surfaces are subjected to erosive mechanisms, such as weathering processes and activity of boring organisms (including cyanobacteria), which can create superficial holes or crevices of variable, microscopic size (Golubic 1969, Naylor et al 2012, Pappalardo et al 2016 in this study). These hypotheses were supported by the particularly evident decrease in RVI values on 11 May 2012, when the average air temperature was relatively high, especially compared with the other 2 sampling days.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, our results could be explained by the capacity of EMPB to move and shelter within microscopic spaces following an increase in light intensity and/or desiccation stress from the morning until the early afternoon. Although the vertical migration range in rock substrata is apparently limited, rock surfaces are subjected to erosive mechanisms, such as weathering processes and activity of boring organisms (including cyanobacteria), which can create superficial holes or crevices of variable, microscopic size (Golubic 1969, Naylor et al 2012, Pappalardo et al 2016 in this study). These hypotheses were supported by the particularly evident decrease in RVI values on 11 May 2012, when the average air temperature was relatively high, especially compared with the other 2 sampling days.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In doing so, some organic covers are thought to limit wetting-drying cycles, and damaging salt crystallisation and hydration events (e.g., Gowell et al, 2015). In contrast to microorganisms and plants, we are aware of only one published empirical study (Pappalardo et al, 2016) exploring the potential influence of common sedentary marine animals (such as barnacles, mussels and encrusting worms) on rock breakdown in the coastal zone.…”
Section: Coastal Rocks and Engineered Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Pappalardo et al (2016) attempted to quantify the influence of barnacles (C. montaguii and C. stellatus) on rock hardness directly (using a Schmidt Hammer) at a range of field sites in Italy. Their observations show that patterns were inconsistent between sites, and differences were generally inconclusive, or at most very small.…”
Section: Thermal Fatiguementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our temperature record, instead, is strictly related to the temperature of the rock surface. A hypothesis for the interpretation of our evidence, based on data provided by [17,27] may account for a "micro-greenhouse effect" triggered by the barnacle cover. These biota, in fact, produce carbon dioxide through respiration as well as the processes through which the build their shell.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%