2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-006-0175-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative diffusion tensor MR imaging of the brain: field strength related variance of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and fractional anisotropy (FA) scalars

Abstract: Quantitative diffusion tensor MR imaging of the brain: field strength related variance of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and fractional anisotropy (FA) scalars Abstract The objectives were to study the "impact" of the magnetic field strength on diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) metrics and also to determine whether magnetic-field-related differences in T2-relaxation times of brain tissue influence DTI measurements. DTI was performed on 12 healthy volunteers at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla (within 2 h) using identical … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
93
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
8
93
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Huisman et al. (2006) studied the “impact” of magnetic field strength on DTI metrics and found that lower ADC values were recorded at higher field strengths, comparing 1.5 with 3.0 Tesla MRI scanners. In summary, the present study gave a more complete and accurate evaluation of microstructural integrity of the cerebral WM in COPD with and without cigarette smoking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Huisman et al. (2006) studied the “impact” of magnetic field strength on DTI metrics and found that lower ADC values were recorded at higher field strengths, comparing 1.5 with 3.0 Tesla MRI scanners. In summary, the present study gave a more complete and accurate evaluation of microstructural integrity of the cerebral WM in COPD with and without cigarette smoking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12][13][14][17][18][19] We observed interimager variability in the ADC values of gray and white matter and a wide range of ADC values of gray matter that was probably attributable to tissue-specific characteristics. One histological difference between gray and white matter is capillary perfusion, as suggested by the intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) theory.…”
Section: ¹6mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…6 -10 Although earlier studies set scanning parameters as identically as possible to ensure comparability of the instruments, they pointed to interimager variability in ADC values. [12][13][14] We were concerned with the marked variability between imagers using routine clinical settings and therefore designed the current volunteer study. Nevertheless, whether or not scanning pa- …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations