Interimager Variability in ADC Measurement of the Human Brain

Abstract

Purpose: Routine clinical practice involves the application of diverse scanning parameters that can affect apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values. We evaluated interimager variability in ADC values with respect to their potential effect in clinical applications.Methods: In 7 healthy volunteers, we obtained diffusion-weighted (DW) images using routine clinical parameters and 1.5-(n = 9) and 3-tesla (n = 3) magnetic resonance (MR) imagers from 5 different vendors, performing 84 MR imaging studies. To evaluate the differences in ADC values among the imagers, vendors, and magnetic field strengths, we measured the mean pixel values of the frontal white matter and thalamus (gray matter) in both cerebral hemispheres of the 7 volunteers and used repeated-measures analysis of variance for multiple comparisons.Results: The laterality of ADC values in the bilateral structures ranged from one to 3% for the 12 imagers. Although the relative difference in ADC values of white matter was 7% for scanners yielding the highest and lowest mean ADC values (P < 0.01), it was within 2 to 4% for instruments from the same vendors. For gray matter, the interimager difference was 4 to 12%, even among the same vendors (P < 0.05). Among the 3T imagers, the difference for white and gray matter was approximately 3%.Conclusions: There were significant interimager differences in ADC values, especially with respect to gray matter. Taking into consideration the existing laterality, however, the differences among our 3T imagers may be acceptable despite the use of diverse scanning parameters. In routine clinical practice, the existing variability must be considered imager by imager.

Hyperglycemia is associated with more severe cytotoxic injury after stroke

“…Normalization to the baseline was performed in order to adjust for variation among individuals and technical variation between scanner and ADC acquisition settings. 23 Stroke volume (mL) and intensity ratios were calculated for all subjects. Imaging analyses were performed by trained readers (M.B.B.…”

Temporal and sequence-related variability in diffusion-weighted imaging of presumed cerebrovascular accidents in the dog brain

“…DWI MRI characteristics are known to vary with hardware ( 36 , 37 ) and software ( 37 – 39 ) properties and are subject to interobserver variability in measurement ( 40 , 41 ). Nonetheless, they are included in many standard brain MRI series and are regularly interpreted by neuroradiologists and neurologists.…”

Differences in the gray-to-white matter ratio according to different computed tomography scanners for outcome prediction in post-cardiac arrest patients receiving target temperature management

“…However, considering the results of this study, the neurologic outcome prediction power of GWR may have been evaluated less than the actual GWR. In addition, recent imaging techniques, such as MRI or CT, undergo a normalization process to compensate for differences in equipment [ 18 , 22 – 25 ]. To our knowledge, no study has reported normalization for GWR measurements.…”

“…Additionally, brain CT images are affected by several parameters, such as voltage, current, and software version [ 17 ]. The values obtained from these different factors are likely to show a clear difference [ 17 , 18 ]. Therefore, it is necessary to assume that there is no intermachine variability when analyzing the results obtained from different machines and settings.…”